العوامل المحددة-لجودة-وظيفة-المراجعة-الداخلية-فى-تحسين-جودة-حوكمة-الشركات-مع-دراسة-تطبيقية-سمير-كامل
April 5, 2018 | Author: Anonymous |
Category:
Documents
Description
1. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ-ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﻜﺘﻭﺭ/ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﻜﺎﻤﻝ ﺴﻤﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﺴﺘﺎﺫ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻜﻠﻴﺔ-ﺍﻹﺴﻜﻨﺩﺭﻴﺔ ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ١-ﻤﻘﺩﻤﺔ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻤﻨﺫ١٩٩٧ﻴ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻡ ﺃﺨﺫ ،ﺍﻷﺴﻴﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻨﻔﺠﺎﺭ ﻭﻤﻊﻨﻅـﺭﺓ ﻨﻅـﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ.ﻜﺎﻨـﺕ ﺒﺄﻨﻬـﺎ ﻭﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺯﻤﺔ ﺇﻟـﻰ ﺒـﺭﺯﺕ ﺍﻟﺘـﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﻜﻝ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺭﻴﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺅﺴﺴﺎﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺜﻘﺔ ﺃﺯﻤﺔ ﻭﺤﺼـﻭﻝ ،ﻭﺍﻷﺼـﺩﻗﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻷﻗﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻅﻔﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺯﻤﺔ ﺃﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺩﻤﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻫﺎﺌﻠﺔ ﻤﺒﺎﻟﻎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕﻓﻴﻪ ﺤﺭﺼﺕ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﻭﻗﺕ ﻨﻔﺱ ﻓﻰ ،ﺍﻷﺠﻝ ﻗﺼﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﻴﻭﻥ ﹰﺎﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﻴ ﺒﺈﺨﻔﺎﺌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﻴﻭﻥ ﺒﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﻋﺩﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ.ﺍﻷﺨﻴـﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺤـﺩﺍﺙ ﺃﻥ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﺒﺈﻓﻼﺱ ﺀﺍﺒﺘﺩﺍ"ﺍﻨﺭﻭﻥ"ﺒﻭﻀـﻭﺡ ﺃﻅﻬـﺭ ،ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴـﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻭﻏﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﻟﻠﻁﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻋﺘﺒ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺘﺎﺩ ﻤﻥ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺤﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔﻤﺎﻟﻴـﺔ ﹰﺎﺃﺴـﻭﺍﻗ ﺎﺭﻫـﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻗﺭﻴﺒﺔ.ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻷﻤﺭﻴﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻭﺥ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻭﺩﻓﻊﻗﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﺇﺼﺩﺍﺭ"Sarbanes Oxley"ﻋﺎﻡ٢٠٠٢ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﻬﺩﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻯ ،. ﻤﻤﺜﻠ ﺒﻬﺎ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻭﺍﻷﻨﺸﻁﺔ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥﻭﺃﺼﺤﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺒﺎﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﻟﺢﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻭﻀﻤﺎﻥﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﺒﺘﻁﺒﻴﻕ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﺘﻐﻠﺏ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ.ﺍﻟﻔﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺘﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺩﻗﺔ ﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻟﻠﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻋﻥ ﻜﺎﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻋﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ)IIA, 2003a.(ﻜﻤﺎ ﺘﺅﺩﻯﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀﻤﻜﺎﻓﺤﺔ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺠﻨﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺠﺫﺏ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻝ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺘﻜﻠﻔﺔ ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺨﺎﺹ ﺒﺸﻜﻝ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﻴﺯﻴﺩ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﻟﻠﺨﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻷﻤﻭﺍﻝ ﺭﺅﻭﺱ ﻫﺭﻭﺏ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺩ ،ﺍﻟﻔﺴﺎﺩ ﻤﺼﺭ ﺒﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻤﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﻭﻝ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ. 2. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢ ﺃﺴ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺃﺭﺒﻌﺔ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺔ ﻭﻴﺘﻡﻋﻼﻗـﺎﺕ ﺘﺭﺒﻁﻬﺎ ﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﻫﻰ ﺘﻌﺎﻭﻨﻴﺔ:ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌـﺔ ﻭﻭﻅﻴﻔـﺔ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)IIA, 2003a.(ﺘﺤﺴـﻴﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺘﺴﻬﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨـﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠـﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥ ،ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺒﺩﻋﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻙﺍﻟﺸـﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻟﻬﺫﻩ.ﺃﻜﺩﺘـﻪ ﻤـﺎ ﻭﻫـﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ)ﺍﻟﻤﺜـﺎﻝ ﺴـﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻅﺭ:Schneider and Wilner, 1990; Hansen, 1997; Antoine, 2004; O'Leary and Stewart, 2007(ﺤﻴـﺙ ، ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻲ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕﻴﺘﻤﺜﻝﻓﻰ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ. ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﺘﻐﻴﺭﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﻭﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺒﺄﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺘﻬﺎﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ)Antoine, 2004.(ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﺄﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﻨﻴﻥ ،ﺍﻹﺭﺸﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻭﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺘﻌﺎﻭﻨﻴﺔﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ.ﺘﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻡ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﻓﻘﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺀﻭﺒﻨﺎ ﻤﻥ ﻜﻝ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻬﺎ:ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ)Tapestry Networks, 2004; Abbott et al. 2007.( ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﻫﺎﻡﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻷﺭﺒﻌﻴﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺃﻭﺍﺌﻝ ﻤﻨﺫ)Moeller, 2004(ﻤﺭﻭﺭ ﻤﻊ ﻨﻁﺎﻗﻪ ﻭﺍﺘﺴﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺘﻁﻭﺭ ﻭﻗﺩ ، ﺍﻟﺯﻤﻥ.ﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻓﻴﺘﻀﻤﻥﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻴﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺇﻁﺎﺭ ﻓﻰ ﹰﺓﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭ ﺘﻘﻊ ﻭﻜﻠﻬﺎ ،ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ)Hermanson and Rittenberg, 2003.(ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﻭﻗﺩ ﻗﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﻓﺭﻀﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ"SarbanesOxley Act of 2002"ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ. 3. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣ ﻗﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﻏﻡ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ"SarbanesOxley Act of 2002"ﺒﺸﻜﻝ ﻴﺤﺩﺩ ﻟﻡ ﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﻭﺴﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻻ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻗﺎﻁﻊ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﻴﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻟﻜﻝ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﹰﺎﺭﺍﺒﻌ ﹰﺎﻁﺭﻓ ﺒﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺘﻭﺴﻴﻊ.ﻓﻌﻝ ﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻡ ﺃﻟﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ٣٠٢ﻗﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﻤﻥ" SarbanesOxley Act of 2002 " ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻹﻓﺼﺎﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻭﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺒﺎﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺒﻊ.ﺍﻟﻘﺴ ﻭﺃﻟﺯﻡﺭﻗﻡ ﻡ٤٠٤ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ،ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ،ﺒﺘﻭﺜﻴﻕ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺇﺒﺩﺍﺀ ﺒﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻭﺃﻟﺯﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﺘﺒﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﺃﻯ.ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻡ ﻭﺃﻟﺯﻡﺭﻗﻡ ٣٠١ﺒﺭﻨﺎﻤ ﺒﺈﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔﺇﻨﺫﺍﺭ ﺞ)Whistleblower Program(ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻌﻤﻝ ﺃﻟﺯﻤ ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﻜﻝ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭﻬﺎﺍﻟﻘﺴﻡﺭﻗﻡ٤٠٦ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻋﻥ ﺒﺎﻹﻓﺼﺎﺡﺍﻻﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡﺒﺍﻷﺨﻼﻗﻴﺔ ﺎﻟﻘﻭﺍﻋﺩ. ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺘﻭﺴﻴﻊ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺃﺩﺕ ﻭﻗﺩ ﻫ ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻟﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂﺕ ﺩﻋﻡﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺘﺘﻭﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻹﻟﺯﺍﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺫﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺘﺒﻠﻐﻬﺎﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺘﺒﺫﻟﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺒﺎﻟﺠﻬﻭﺩ ﺒﺄﻭﻝ ﹰﻻﺃﻭ ﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻡ ﻤﻊ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺸﻰ٣٠١ﻭ٤٠٦ﺍﻹﻨﺫﺍﺭ ﺒﺭﻨﺎﻤﺞ ﻓﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ.ﻤﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﺘﺘﻭﻗﻊ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﻴﺘﻁﻠﺒﻪ ﻟﻤﺎ ﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺭ ﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻡ٤٠٤.ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻜﺎﻤﻠﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﻤﺎ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻕ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﺠﺭﻴﻬﺎ )Integrated Audit(ﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻴﺘﻁﻠﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ)٢()PCAOB, 2004.( ﻜﻜﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻨﺎﻓﺫﺓ ﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺼﻑ ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥ )Tapestry Networks, 2004(ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ُﺫﻥﺃﻭ ﻋﻴﻥ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﻜﻤﺎ ،)Sawyer, 1973.( ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﺃﻨﺤﺎﺀ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻭﺼﻭﻟﻬﺎ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺍ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺩﻋﻡ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﺭﻴﺩ ﻤﻭﻗﻊ ﻓﻰﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﻟﺜﻼﺙ.ﻴﺠﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ،ﺒﺎﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺃﺼﺤﺎﺏ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻟﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﺩﻭﻯ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻨﻘﻭﻝ 4. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﺘﻜﺎﻤﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺠﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ)Vallario, 2003.(ﻭﻗﻭﻴﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻟﻜﻰﻟﺩﻋﻡ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻼﺌﻡ ﺒﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺘﺘﻤﻴﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺠﺏ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ.ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺒﺄﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺘﺄﺜﺭ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ.ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻠﻌﺏ ﻭﻟﻜﻰ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻴﺘﻭﺍﻓﺭ ﺃﻥﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻭﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺅﺩﻯ ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﺎﻟﺘﺒﻌﻴﺔ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺒﺎﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺠﻭﺩﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ. ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﻅﺭﻯ ﺸﻘﻬﺎ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺘﻬﺩﻑﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻭﻗﻭﻑﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻟ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ،ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺭﺤﺘﻪ ﻤﻤﺎ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﻼﺼﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻗﺘﺭﺤﺘﻪ ﻤﺎ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺅﺴﺴﺎﺕ ﺃﺼﺩﺭﺘﻬﺎﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ. ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻕ ﻭﻴﻬﺩﻑﺘﻠﻙ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻤﻤﺎ ﹰﺎﻋﻤﻠﻴ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕﺩﻭﺭ ﻠﻴﺔﹰﺍﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﹰﺎﻴﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥﻤﺼﺭ ﻓﻰ. ﺍﻟﺩﺍﻓﻌﻴﺔ ﻭﺘﺭﺠﻊﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﻟﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩﻫﻤﺎ ﺴﺒﺒﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ:ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺒﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺭﺘﺒﻁ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻓﻰﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﻻ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻭ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ)Uecker et al. 1981.(ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻰ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﹰﺔﻤﺅﺩﻴ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻭﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ.ﻭ ﻭﻋﻠﻰﺍﻟﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺠﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﺅﺩﻯ ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﻅﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺇﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﺕ ﺭﺩﻉﺭﺩﻉﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﺴﺭﻗﺎﺕ)Schneider and Wilner, 1990; Hansen, 1997, O'Leary and Stewart, 2007.(ﺫﻟﻙ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻀﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺃﻥﻭﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ 5. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺇﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻷﺨﻁﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺘﺤﺴﻥ)Gordon and Smith, 1992.( ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﺎﻹﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻰ ﻴﻤﻜﻥﺘﻭﺴﻴﻊ ﻨﺤﻭ ﻤﺘﺯﺍﻴﺩ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻥ ﻨﺠﺩ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺅﺩﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ)ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻅﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ:Antoine, 2004.(ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﺎﺌﺢ ﺤﺜﺕ ﻭﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﺜﻝ ﺘﺩﻓﻊ ﻟﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻀﻰ ﻭﻓﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔﺍﻟﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻀﺎﺌﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﻓﻴﻨﻅﺭ ﺍﻟﻴﻭﻡ ﺃﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺨﻼﻗﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻠﻭﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﻨﻅﻡ ﺍﻨﻬﻴﺎﺭ ﻤﺸﺎﻜﻝ ﺤﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺠﺯﺀ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ )Bailey et al. 2003.( ﺃ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻓﺘﺘﻤﺜﻝ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺴﻌﻰ ﻨﻬﺎﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻟﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻤﺤﺩﺩﺍﺕ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﻓﻰ ﺘﻠﻌﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﺘﺩ ﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻤﻊ ﺘﻌﺎﻭﻨﻴﺔ ﺒﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺘﺭﺘﺒﻁ ﻭﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﹰﺔﺨﺎﺼ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ.ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺃﺜﺒﺘﺕ ﻓﻠﻭ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺩﻝ ﻓﻬﺫﺍ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻭﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻁ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺸﺭﻴﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻜﺱ ﺒﺎﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ.ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﹰﺍﺇﺭﺸﺎﺩ ﻗﺩﻤﺕ ﻗﺩ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻭﺒﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔﻷﺼﺤﺎﺏ ﻭﺃﻜﺩﺕ ،ﻟﻠﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻓﻰ ﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻋﻡ ﻭﺴﺎﺌﻝ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﺘﻭﻓﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﻟﺫﻟﻙ ﻟﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻤﻊ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺘﺤﺴﻥ ،ﺠﻭﺩﺘﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺘﺤﺴﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻤﺼﺎﻟﺤﻬﻡ ﻴﻌﻅﻡ ﻭﺒﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻰ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻤﻥﺍﻟﺨﺎﺼﺔ. ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﻘﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﻘﺴﻴﻡ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺩﻑ ﻭﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕﺃﺭﺒﻌﺔﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺠﺯﺀ ﻴﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ،ﺃﺠﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺯﺀ ﻓﻰ ﻭﻴﺘﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔﻭ ﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﻓﺭﻭﺽ.ﺍﻟﺠﺯﺀ ﻭﻴﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﻫﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺅﻫﺎ ﺘﻡ ﻋﻴﻨﺔﻤﻥ ﺘﺘﻜﻭﻥ:ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡﺨﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﻌﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻤﺼﺭ ﺠﻤﻬﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺒﻌﺽ،ﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀ 6. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٦ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺒﺘﻠﻙﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻜﺎﺘﺏ ﺒﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﺸﺭﻜﺎﺀ ،. ﻭﺨﺼﺹﺍﻟﺠﺯﺀﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒﻊﻭﺍﻷﺨﻴﺭﻟﻭﺍﻟﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻠﺨﻼﺼﺔ. ٢-ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺍ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﺘﻤﻴﺯﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺘﺼـﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﺩﻤﺕ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺸﺎﻤﻠﺔ ﺤﻭﻜﻤـﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺤﺘﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻰ ﺒﺎﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻤﻔﻴﺩﺓ ﻭﺃﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ.ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺯﺀ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻭﻴﻬﺩﻑﺃﻫﻡ ﻭﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻋﺭﺽﺍﻟﺴـﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﻓﻰﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ،ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﺒﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﺔ ﺫﺍﺕﺍﻻﺘﺠﺎﻫـﺎﺕ ﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻜﺘﻠﻙ ﻭﺘﻠﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔﺜـﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌـﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻜﺯﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕﺍﻟﻤﺘﺒﺎﺩﻟﺔﻭﺃﻁـﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴـﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ.ﻭﺫﻟﻙﺒﻐﺭﺽﺇﺒﺭﺍﺯﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻤﺘﺩ ﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻠﻌﺒﻪﻓﻰ ﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓﻫﺫﺍ ،ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﻨﺎﺤﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻓﺭﻭﺽ ﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﻨﺎﺤﻴﺔﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴـﺔ ﺨـﻼﻝ ﻤـﻥ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺴﻴﺘﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ.ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﺒﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﻘﺴﻴﻡ ﻭﺘﻡ: ٢/١:ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﺍﻻﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭﻅﻴﻔ ﺘﻠﻌﺏﹰﺍﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺔﹰﺎﻫﺎﻤﻓﻲ،ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂﺕ ﻜﺎﻓﺔﺘﻘﻭﻡ ﺤﻴﺙﺒﻤﺩ ،ﻨﺎﺤﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﻓﻲ ﺘﺴﺎﻋﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﻀﺭﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻋﻥ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻭﺇﻤﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻨﻅﺎﻡﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔﺍﻟﻤﻁﺒﻕﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﻨﺎﺤﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ.ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﻏﻡ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ،ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺘﻠﻙﻓﻜﺎﻨﺕﺍﻟﺴﺎﺌﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻅﺭ ﻭﺠﻬﺔﺒﺸﺄﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻨﻁﺎﻕﺃﻨﻪ ﺘﺭﻯﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻭﺍﺤﻲ ﻓﻘﻁ ﻴﺸﻤﻝ. ﻭﻤﻊﺍﻟﻭﻗﺕ ﻤﺭﻭﺭﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻔﻬﻭﻡ ﺘﻁﻭﺭﻭﺍﻟﻨﻅﺭﺓ ﺘﻐﻴﺭﺕﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎﺤﻴﺙ ، ﺠﺯ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭﺃﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺒﺎﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻗﻴﺎﻤﻬﺎ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻴﺘﺠﺯﺃ ﻻ ﻜﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡﺃﺩﺍﺀﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥﺒ،ﺎﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓﻤﺩﺍﻟﺘﻭﻗﻴﺕ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻜﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﺴﺏﺃ،ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺘﻭﺍﺠﻬﻬﺎ ﻥﻭﺒﺎﻟﻌﻨﺎﺼﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺘﺯﻭﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺅﻫﻠﺔﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﻟﻠﻘﻴﺎﻡ.ﺤﻤﺎﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻤﺜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩﻴﺔ ﻤﻬﺎﻤﻬﺎ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﺎﻹﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﻫﺫﺍ 7. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٧ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺃﺼﻭﻝﺍﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻜﺩ ،ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻤﺭﻏﻭﺏ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺘﺼﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﺃﻯ ﻤﻥﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺒﺎﻟﺴﻴﺎﺴﺎﺕ)Ahlawat and Lowe, 2004(. ﺭﻗﺎﺒﻰ ﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻋﺭﻑ ﻭﻗﺩ ،ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻰ ،ﻤﺴﺘﻘﻝﺍﻟﺘﻭﺼﻴ ﻭﺇﺒﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻜﻴﺩﺍﺕ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺸﺄﻨﻪ ﻤﻥ ،ﻭﺍﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﻱﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺎﺕ ﺃﺩﺍﺌﻬﺎ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻭﺘﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺘﺯﻴﺩ ﻤﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻕ.ﻫﺫﺍ ﻭﻴﺴﺎﻋﺩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﻤﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺃﺴﺎﻟﻴﺏ ﺒﻭﻀﻊ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻤﻥ ﻜﻝ:ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻭﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ)The IIA, 2000.( ﻫﺫﺍ ﻭﺃﺩﻯﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺙ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﻰﺘﻭﺴﻴﻭﺍﺠﺒﺎﺘ ﻊﻬﺎﻭﺇﺒﺭﺍﺯﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻟﻠﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻓﻰ ﺘﻠﻌﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺠﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻯ ،ﺍﻟﻭﺍﺴﻊ)Colbert, 2002(. ﻭﻓﻰﺍﺴﺘﻁﻼﻉﻷﻤﻥ ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﺀﺍﻟﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﻥﻭﺃﺨﺼﺎﺌﻴﻴﻥ ﻭﻤﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﻴﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻲﺃﻭﺼﻰﻨﺴﺒﺘﻪ ﻤﺎ٩٠%ﺍﻟ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺒﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﻤﻨﻬﻡﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﺃﺴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻫﻭ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺩﺨﻝ ﺒﺘﺒﻨﻲ)Risk Based Audit(-ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺨﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺒﻬﺎ ﻴﻘﺼﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻟﻠﺨﻁﺭ ﻋﺭﻀﺔ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻷﻨﺸﻁﺔ-ﻭﺃﻥﺃﻤﻥ ﻜﺜﺭ٣٠%ﻤﻨﻬﻡﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺃﻨﻪﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ ﻠﻰﻓﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻰﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻜﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻭﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺘﻭﺍﺠﻬﻬﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺎ )Quinn, 2002(. ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻭﺃﺭﺍﺀ ﺘﺼﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻟﻠﻭﻗﻭﻑ ﺃﺠﺭﻯ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ"Nagy and Cenker, 2002"ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯﺓ.ﻭﺠﻬﺕ ﺤﻴﺙﺇﻟﻴﻬﻡﻤﻥ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻤﺎ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ،ﻤﻌﻬﻡ ﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻼﺕ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﺃﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻷﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﻴﻠﻰ: ١-،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻤﻥ ﺒﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺘﺘﺒﺎﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻴﺘﺭﺍﻭﺡ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻗ ﻭﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﺴﻁ ﻓﻰ ﺘﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻤﻌﻅﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻻ ،ﻤﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﻴﻤﺔ 8. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٨ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ.ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﺤﺩﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻀﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺃﻭ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻭ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺱ. ٢-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﺃﻭ ﺘﺤﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﻟﻠﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻝ ﻭﻀﻊ ﻓﻰ ﻴﺘﺭﻜﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺅﺴﺴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻭﺃﻥ ،ﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺇﺭﺸﺎﺩﺍﺕ. ٣-ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻘﺩﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺩﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻌﺩﻴﻝ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﺒﻌﺩﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺩﻤﺎﺕ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺘﻘﺩﺭ ﺘﻔﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻟﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﻘﺩﻤﻬﺎﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ.ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑ ﻴﻘﺘﺭﺤﻪ ﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺃﻜﺩﺕ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺒﺄﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺙﺍﻟﻤﻬﻤﺔﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﻟﺍ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ.ﻟﺩﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺘﻘ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺭﺍﺕﺘﻭﺍﺠﻬﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺩﻴﺭ ﻋﻥ ﹰﺎﺩﺍﺌﻤ ﻴﺒﺤﺜﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯ ﻭﺃﻥ ،ﻤﺭﻀﻴﺔ ﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﻓﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻭﻁﺭﻕ ﺃﺴﺎﻟﻴﺏ. ٤-ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻟﺩﻯ ﺠﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﻗﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻭ ﻤﻤﺘﺎﺯﺓ ﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻗﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﺘﺼﺎﻝ ﻗﻨﻭﺍﺕ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻭﺃﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻭﻤﺩﻴﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ.ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯ ﻤﻌﻅﻡ ﻭﻴﻌﺘﻘﺩ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺒﺸﺭﻜﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺃﻨﺸﻁﺔ ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺘﺘﻭﻗﻌﻪ ﻤﺎ ﻤﻊ ﺘﺘﻔﻕ. ٥-ﺍﻹ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺎﺤﺩﻴﺜ ﺃﻟﻘﻴﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﻏﻡ ﻋﻠﻰﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻻ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻤﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻋﻡ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﻘﺩﻡ ﻟﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺭﻴﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﻭﻟﻥ. 9. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٩ ﻗﻭﺍﻤﻬﺎ ﺼﻐﻴﺭﺓ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻴﻌﻴﺏ ﻭﻤﺎ١١ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ،ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺤﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺯﻴﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻭﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﻤﻴﻡ ﻗﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺩﻋﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻘﺩﻤﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻭﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺙ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ ﻟﻸﻁﺭﺍﻑ. ﻭﺍﻷﻭﺭﻭﺒ ﺍﻻﺘﺤﺎﺩ ﻓﻰﻰﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Downes, 2004"ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻰﻟﺠﻨﺔﺍﻷﻭﺭﻭﺒﻰ ﺍﻻﺘﺤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻜﺩﺕﺃﻥﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﻤﻥ ﹰﺍﺠﺯﺀ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻻﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﻟﻴﺸﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻘﻁ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ.ﻭﻟﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺱ ﺘﻁﺒﻕ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻﺒﺩ ﺒﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺘﺤﻘﻕ: -ﻤﺴﺒﻘﺔ ﻋﺎﻤﺔ ﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ)General Prerequisites.( -ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺸﺭﻭﻁ ﻭﻀﻊ. -ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ. -ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ. ﻭﺃﻜﺩﺕﺍﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔﻨﺠﺎﺡ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡﺃﻨﻬﺎﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺘﺤﻘﻕ: -ﻓﻰ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻤﺭﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﻀﻤﺎﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﻗﺒﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ.،ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭﺓ ﺒﺼﻔﺔ ﺘﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻌﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻤﺭﺍﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻜﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺃﺼﺤﺎﺏ ﻟﺩﻯ ﺒﺎﻟﺭﺍﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﻭﺭ ﻴﺤﻘﻕ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﻤﻥﺍﻹﺼﻼﺤﺎﺕﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﻗﻴﺕ ﻓﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺴﻴﻨﺎﺕ. -ﺍﻟﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻷﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﺒﻨﺎﺀ.ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙﺒﺎﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻤﺘﻼﻙ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻭﺘﻜﻭﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﺯﺠﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﻡ ﺍﻨﺠﺎﺯ ﻭﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺒﺸﺄﻥﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻟﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﻟﻸﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﹰﺎﻤﺴﺒﻘ. -ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ.ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺯﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻓﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥﻡ ﺒﺎﻟﺴﻴﺎﺴﺎﺕﻭﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕﻷﻫﺩﺍﻓﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﺍﻨﺠﺎﺯ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﺌﺢ 10. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٠ ﹰﺍﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻭﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ،ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻴﺔ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔﹰﺎﺭﻗﺎﺒﻴﹰﺎﻫﺎﻤﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺒﺘﻠﻙ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻭﺍﺌﺢ. -ﻟﻠﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﺨﺩﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ.ﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﻡ ﻓﺭﻴﺩ ﻤﻭﻗﻊ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻭﻥ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﻤﻥﺘﺯﻭﻴﺩﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﻓﺎﻥ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻀﺭﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻼﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺃﺠﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﻋﻡ ﺘﻘﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ. ﻭﺃﻨﻨﺎ ﺇﻻ ،ﻵﺨﺭ ﻋﻘﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﻏﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻀﺭ ﺍﻟﻭﻗﺕ ﻓﻰ ﻨﻭﺍﺠﻪﺍﻟﺼﻌﻭﺒﺎﺕﻭ ﺒﻔﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﻭﺃﻫﻤﻴﺘﻬﺎ.ﻟﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﻜﻭﻨﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﺤﻭﻟﺕ ﻓﻘﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﻅﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻘﻁ ﻗﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﺘﻌﺩ ﻓﻠﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻔﻬﻭﻡ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺃﺸﻤﻝ ﺃﻭﺴﻊ ﻭ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻋﺏ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻟﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔﺍﻤﺘﺩ ﺇﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﺘﻌﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﻟﻴﺸﻤﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺨﺼﻭﺹ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻟﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ.ﻤﺯﺍﻴﺎ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻻﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻭﺤﺘﻰ ﺒﺎﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺠﺏ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ)،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺭ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﻴﻥﺍﺠﻌﺔ...ﺍﻟﺦ(ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻡ ﻟﺩﻴﻬﻡ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)Staciokas and Rupsys, 2005(. ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺍ"Arena and Azzone, 2005"ﺇﻟﻰﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻠﻌﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﺘﻨﺒﻪ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﺠﻨﺔﺇﻟﻰﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺘ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻤﺔﻜﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﻭﻤﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺅﺜﺭﺃﻥﹰﺍﺩﻭﺭ ﻟﻬﺎﹰﺎﺍﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﻴﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﺘﻐﻠﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻟﻴﺏ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ.ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕﺇﻟﻰﺃﻥ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺘﺴﺎﻋﺩ ﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺩﻯ ﻴﻜﻭﻥﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﻓﻰﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﻭﺘﺭﺘﺒﻁ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔﺒﻤ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺩﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺩﻋﻡ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺼﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻜﻔﺎﻴﺔ ﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ ﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻘﺴﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ.ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻭﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺇﻟﻰﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺘﻔﻌﻴﻝﻴﺅﺩﻯﺇﻟﻰ ﻟﻠﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Liu, 2005"ﺇﻟﻰﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻌﺔ 11. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١١ ﻭﺒﻼ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺭﻜﺯ ﻭﺃﺼﺒﺤﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩﻯ ﺍﻹﻁﺎﺭ ﻋﻥ ﺨﺭﺠﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﺘﻔﻌﻴﻝ ﺠﻭﺩﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺸﻙ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ "Whitley, 2005"ﺇﻟﻰﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻠﻌﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕﻓﻰ ﺭﻫﺎﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ. ﺒﻠﺠﻴﻜﺎ ﻭﻓﻰﺃﺸﺎﺭﺍ", 2006De BeeldeSarens and"ﻓﻰﺃﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﻭﺼﻑ ﺒﻬﺩﻑﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻰ ﻟﺩﻭﺭﻫﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻋﻴﻨ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻤﺭﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺠﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺒﻜﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺔ ﺒـ ﺍﻟﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ١٠،ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕﺇﻟﻰﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻭﻥ ﻴﻠﻌﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻭﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻷﻤﺭﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﺠﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺒﻜﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻰ ﻥ ﻤﻬﻨﺔ ﻟﻜﻭﻥ ﺒﻠﺠﻴﻜﺎ ﻓﻰ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻤﺭﻴﻜﺎ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻥ ،ﻟﻠﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻨﺘﻘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻻﺯﺍﻟﺕ ﺒﻠﺠﻴﻜﺎ ﻓﻰ ﻴﺔ.ﻭﺍﺴﺘﺭﺍﻟﻴﺎ ﻓﻰﺃﺸﺎﺭﺍ "Goodwin and Kent, 2006"ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺭﺍﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺒﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺠﻠﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻗﻭﻯ ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻓﻜﻠﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺒﺈﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡ ﻭﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻰ ﻭﺭﻏﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﻼﺴﺘﻌﺎﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﻜﻠﻤﺎ. ﻭﺍﻷﻤﺭﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺤﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻭﻻﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻰ ﹰﺎﺤﺩﻴﺜﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ", 2006Hermanson"ﺇﻟﻰﺃﻥ ﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ"Deloitte"ﺒﻌﻨﻭﺍﻥ"ﻗﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﻋﺼﺭ ﻅﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺘﻌﻅﻴﻡ SarbanesOxley "ﺃﻜﺩﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻟﻐﺵ ﺍﻜﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻭﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻰ ﻴﺄﺨﺫﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻁﻠﺏ ﻜﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭﺇﻟﻰﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﻗﺎﻨﻭﻥ ﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ"SarbanesOxley"ﻫﻰ ﺃﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﻤﺠﺎﻻﺕ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ:ﺍﻻﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ،ﻟﻸﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻟﻤ ﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ ﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻨﻤﻭ ﻓﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ،ﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ. ﻤﻥ ﻨﻁﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﺍﺘﺴﻊ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺴﺒﻕ ﻤﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻭﻴﺨﻠﺹ ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﹰﺔﻤﺘﻤﺜﻠ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻗﻴﻤﺔﺍﻟﺨﻁ ﺃﺴﺎﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﺨﻝ ﻭﺘﻁﺒﻴﻕ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻓﻰﺭ. ﺒﺎﻟﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩ ﻟﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺃﺩﺍﺌﻬﺎ ﻓﻰ ﹰﺎﻫﺎﻤ ﹰﺍﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺘﻠﻌﺏ 12. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٢ ﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺅﺜﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺒﻌﺽ ﻭﺘﻭﺠﺩ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻁﻠﻭﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺯﺀ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺒﺸﺊ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺴﻴﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ. ٢/٢:ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻟﻜﻰﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻭﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺘﻠﻌﺏ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻨﺠﺢ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﺒﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﹸﺅﺩﻯﺘ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ.ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺅﺜﺭ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ ﻁﺭﻑ ﺒﻜﻝ ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺠﻭ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺒﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻭﻓﺎﺀﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ.ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺒﻊ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ ﻜﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﹰﺍﺠﺯﺀ.ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﺅﺩﻴﻪ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻼﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﺨﻁﻁ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﺍﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻠﻙ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻴﻘﻴﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻴﺔ)AICPA, 2003; PCAOB, 2004.( ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﻰ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻭﺃﻜﺩﺕ)Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)(ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﺘﺤﺴ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺸﺠﻊ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰﺘﻠﻙ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ)PCAOB, 2004.(ﻭﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﻝ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻓﺎﻨﻪ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺇﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ،ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺘﻬﺎ ﺸﻤﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ)PCAOB, 2004.( ﺍﻟﺭﻗ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻜﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺎﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ،ﺒﻤﻔﻬﻭﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﺸﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﻭﺍﺴﻊ.ﻤ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻀﻑﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺘ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥﺍﻟﻤﺩﻴﺭ ﻠﺯﻡﻴﻥﺍﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫﻴﻴﻥﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺒﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ،ﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﻗﺒﺔ)IIA, 2003 b.(ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻟﻜﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻷﻜﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺅﺜﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﺠﻨﺔﻓﻰﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺘﺨﺼﻴﺹ ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔﻭﺘﺤ ﻟﻬﺎﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﹸﺭﻓﻊﺘ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ. 13. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٣ ﻓﻰ ﻴﺭﻏﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ ﻁﺭﻑ ﺃﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﻴﺩﺭﻙ ﺃﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻟﺩﻋﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ.ﻓﺄﺸﺎﺭ"Krishnamoorthy, 2002"ﺇﻟﻰﻓﻬﻡ ﺃﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺘﻠﻙ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻗﻭﺓ ﺘﺤﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﻟﻠﻌﻤﻴﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻫﻴﻜﻝ ﻓﻬﻡ ﻓﻰ ﻴﺴﺎﻋﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝﺍﻟﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﻭﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﻟﻠﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﻗﻴﻕ. ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺤﺩﺩﺕ ﻭﻗﺩﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻟﻜﻝ ﻟ ﺍﻟﻀﺭﻭﺭﻴﺔﻀﻤﺎﻥﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﻓﺤﺩﺩﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ )٦٥) (AICPA, 1991(ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝﺘﺸﻤﻝ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ: ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ)Competence) (ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻘﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ(ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ،)ﹸﺘ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﻬﺔ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻘﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺘﻌﻴﻴﻥ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺠﻬﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ(ﺍﻟﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ،)ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻨﻁﺎﻕ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﺭﺍﻤﺞ ﻭﻜﻔﺎﻴﺔ ﺩﻗﺔ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻘﺎﺱ) (AICPA, 1991.( ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻓﺎﻥ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﻤﺜﻝﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥﺤﺩﺩﺕﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺭﺍﻋﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)Proficiency(ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻴﺔ ﻭﺒﺫﻝ ، )IIA, 2003b.( ﻭﻟﻘﺩﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﺒﺎﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺤﻅﻴﺕﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ،ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﻭﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡﻤﺩﺨﻝﺍﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﻴﺒﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺩﺨﻝ ﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻴﺩﻤﺞ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻪ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻜﻴﻑ ﺍﻟﺫﻜﺭ ﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺤﺩﺩﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ )SAS No. 9 AICPA, 1975; SAS No. 65 AICPA, 1991.(ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩﺍﻟﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻪ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻵﺨﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﻴﺒﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺩﺨﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻭﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻭﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﻜﻤﺎﻝ ،ﺍﻷﺨﻼﻗﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﻴﺭ ﺍﻷﺨﻼﻕ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺭﻜﺯﺕ 14. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٤ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ.ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥﺨﻠﺼﺕ ﻭﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺘﻪ ﻤﺎ ﺘﻠﺨﻴﺹﺇﻟﻴﻪﻋﻠﻰ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻭ: ٢/٢/١:ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﻴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﺃﺠﺭﻴﺕﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩﻭﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ)Criteria(ﻋﺎﻤﻝ ﻜﻝ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ)ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻅﺭ: Brown and Karan, 1986; Messier and Schneider, 1988; DeZoort, et al. 2001.( ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻓﻔﻴﻤﺎ)Competence(ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ"Clark, et al. 1980" ﻭ"Gibbs and Schroeder 1979"ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻜﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺒﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻡ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Brown, 1983"ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻭﻜﺫﻟ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺭﺍﻤﺞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺴﺘﻨﺩ ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﻙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻴﺤﺼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ.ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ "Messier and Schneider, 1988"ﺃﻥ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻜﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﻨﺘ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕﺃﺠﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺎﺌﺞ" Gramling and Myers, 1997" ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﻭﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯ ﻤﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺸﻤﻠﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺎﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴ ﺍﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﺄﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻗﺎﻨﻭﻨﻴﻴﻥ ﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ. ﻭﺒﻤﻭ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻓﻴﻤﺎﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻴﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﻭﻥﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﻘﻼﻝ)ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ:ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ(ﻜﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻜﺜﺭﺘﻬﺎ)Clark, et al. 1981; Brown, 1983; Messier and Schneider, 1988.(ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﹰﺎﻭﺤﺩﻴﺜ"DeZoort, et al. 2001"ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻥﺃﻥ ﻴﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ)ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ(ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺎﻓﺂﺕ ﻭﻫﻴﻜﻝ)ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺘﺏﺍﻟﺤﻭﺍﻓﺯ( 15. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٥ ﻴﺅﺜﺭﺍﻥﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ.ﻭﺘﻭﺼﻼ"Ahlawat and Lowe, 2004"ﺇﻟﻰﻫﻭ ﺃﻥﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺨﺩﻤﺔ ﻤﻘﺩﻡ ﻴﺔ)ﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺃﻭ ﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ(ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﻟﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﻼﻝ. ﻭ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺒﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻓﻴﻤﺎﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Clark, et al. 1980"ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻭﻥ ﻴﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﻪ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﻰﻴﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﻥ ﺍﻟ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺩﻋﻡ ﻫﻭ ﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ "Brown, 1983"ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻁﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺎﺒﻌﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻕ ﺃﺩﺍﺌﻬﺎ ﻋﻥ ﺭﻀﺎﺌﻪ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ.ﺍ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺃﻥﻭﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻜﺸﻑ ﻭﻟﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻴﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺠﻭﻫﺭﻯ ﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺃﻯ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺍ"Messier and Schneider, 1988"ﺇﻟﻰﺃﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺼﻑ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺎﻴﻴﺭ. ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﻭﻓﻰ"Krishnamoorthy, 2001"ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺘﻭﻗﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ.ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺘﻭﻗﻑ ﻻ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﺎﻥ ،ﻤﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ.ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻘﺎﻴﻴﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺘﻭﻗﻑ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﺎﻥ ،ﻋﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﻴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻭﺭﻜﺯﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺤﺩﺩﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ)،ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺃ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺩﺍﺀ(ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻟﺘﻠﻙ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﻌﻁﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ، ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻰ ﺤﻜﻤﻪ ﺒﻨﺎﺀ.ﻓﺄﺸﺎﺭ"Abdelkhalik et al. 1983" 16. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٦ ﺇﻟﻰﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻤﻝ ﺃﻥﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙﻻ ﻭﺃﻨﻪ ،ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔﺒﻴﻥ ﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﻴﻭﺠﺩ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ.ﻭﻭﺠﺩ"Schneider, 1984"ﺠﻭﺩ ﺃﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)٤١,٧(% ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻴﻠﻴﻬﺎ)٣٥,٢(%ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺘﺒﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺘﺄﺘﻰ ﺜﻡ)٢٣,١.(%ﻭﻭﺠﺩ "Schneider, 1985a"ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥﺘﻘ ﻋﻨﺩﻴﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻤﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﺨﻁﻴﻁ ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻨﻔﺱ ﻟﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ،ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻤﻝ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻴﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎﺇﻻﹰﺎﻤﻬﻤ ﹰﻼﻋﺎﻤ ﺃﻨﻪ.ﹰﺎﻭﺃﻴﻀﻭﺠﺩ"Schneider, 1985b"ﻗﻴﺎﺴﻪ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻻﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ)Consensus(ﺒﻴﻥﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﻴﻠﻰ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺘﺭﺘﻴﺏ:ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ. ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺠﺎﺀﺕ"Brown and Karan, 1986"ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻤﻊ ﹰﺔﻤﺘﻔﻘ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﺎﺫﺝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ"Schneider"ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻜﺩﺕ ﺤﻴﺙ ، ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺭﻜﺯﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯﻫﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﺒﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ.ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ"Haron et al. 2004"ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺒﻬﺩﻑ ﺃﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻪ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻴﺴﺘﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺎﻴﻴﺭ ، ﻤﺎﻟﻴﺯﻴﺎﺇﻟﻰﺍﻷﻜﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻭﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻥﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻰﻴﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺎﻟﻴﺯﻴﺎ ﻓﻰ ﻥ ﺍﻻﻋ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥﻋﻠﻴﻬﻡ ﺘﻤﺎﺩ.ﺒﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺴﻴﺎﺴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻀﻌﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺘﻭﺼﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺘﺨﺼﻴﺹ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭﻴﻥ ﻫﺫﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻡ.ﻭﺒﺎﻟﻁﺒﻊﺇﺫﺍﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩﻭﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺭﻭﻋﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺎﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰﺠﻭﺩﺓﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ. ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Margheim, 1986"ﺇﻟﻰﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﺄﺨﺫﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﻟﻨﺤﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺭﺘﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻪ ﻋﻨﺩ 17. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٧ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ:ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ،ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔﻭﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ،.ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺴﺘﺭﺍﻟﻴﺎ ﻭﻓﻰ "Edge and Farley, 1991"ﻴﺄﺨﺫﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻟﻠﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﻟﻸﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩﻩ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻪ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊﺇﻟﻰﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﻝ ﻫﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻴﺔﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻜﺜﺭﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥﺜﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻴﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻴﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ)ﺍﻟﺘﻨ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﺔﻅﻴﻤﻴﺔ(ﻻ ﻭﺃﻨﻪ ،ﺒﻴﻨﻬﻡ ﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﻴﻭﺠﺩ. ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺃﻤﺎ"Messier and Schneider, 1988"ﺒﺘﺭﺘﻴﺏ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺠﻬﺎ ﺠﺎﺀﺕ ﻓﻘﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻏﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻰ ﺠﺎﺀ ﻋﻤﺎ ﻴﺨﺘﻠﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ،ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻌﺎﻤﻝ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻴﻌﻁﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻤ ﻴﻠﻴﻪﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺜﻡ ،ﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ.ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻨﻔﺱ ﻭﻴﺅﻜﺩ "Maletta, 1993"ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﻅﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻭﺠﺩ ﺤﻴﺙ ، ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺜﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻴﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻜﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻤﻝ ﻫﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. ﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ"ﺒﺎﻴﻴﺯ"ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﻟﻼﺤﺘﻤﺎﻻﺕ"Krishnamoorthy, 2002"ﺇﻟﻰ ﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﻟﻸﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺘﺭﺘﻴﺒﻬﺎ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺭﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺘﻭﻗﻑ)Criteria(ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺘﻠﻙ ﺘﺼﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ.ﻫﺫﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺤﻴﺙ ﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭﻤﺘﻀﺎﺭﺒﺔ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺠﻬﺎ ﺠﺎﺀﺕ ﻟﺫﺍ ،ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺨﺘﻠﻔﺕ.ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺇﻟﻰ ﻤﺤﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺃﻥﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻟﻠﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻤﻌﻴﻥ ﺘﺭﺘﻴﺏ ﺇﻴﺠﺎﺩﻋﻠ ﻴﻁﺒﻕﻰﻤﺤﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺘﻌﺩ ،ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻻﺕ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﹰﺎﻋﻤﻠﻴ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺼﻝ ﻟﻥ ﻋﻘﻴﻤﺔ. ﻭﺒﺎﻹﻀﺎﻓﺔﺇﻟﻰﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﺨﺫ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓﻓﺎﻨ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻪﻟﺘﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻗﺒﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺒﻔﺤﺹ ﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﻟﻤﺎ ﺘﺨﻀﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻤﺜﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻭﺫﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺨﺎﺭﺝ:،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻭﺃﻥ ،ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﻤﻨﺸﺂﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻭ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﻴﻴﻥ ﻜﻝ ﻤﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻗﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﺹ٥ﺴﻨﻭﺍﺕ.ﻴﻭﺒﺫﻟﻙ ﺭﺴﻤﻰ ﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺭﻓﻊﻟﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓﻭﻴﺘﻀﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﻫﺫﺍﺍﻟﺭﺃﻯ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﻭﺒﺨﻁﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡ ﻤﺩﻯ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺒﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﻴﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﻜﻤﺎﺍﻹﺼﻼﺡﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ.ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﹰﺍﻤﻔﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰﻓﻘﻁ،ﻭﺇﻨﻤﺎﻴﻔﻴﺩﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀﺍﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠ ﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ،ﻴﻴﻥﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﻭﻤﺠﻠﺱ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ )Colbert, 2002(. 18. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٨ ٢/٢/٢:ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻭﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ُﺘﻀﻌﻑ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻘﻠﻝ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﻓﻭﺠﺩ"Plumlee, 1985"ﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺸﺎﺭﻜﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺫﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺃﻗﻭﻯ ﺭﻗﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺩﺭﺓ ﻟﺩﻴﻬﻡ ﺘﺘﻭﺍﻓﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻨﻅﻡ ﺒﺘﻠﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻭﻥ ﻴﺼﻤﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻙﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﹰﺍﺩﻭﺭ ﻟﺩﻴﻬﻡ ﻴﻜﻥ ﻟﻡ ﺍﻟﺫﻴﻥ ﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ.ﻭﺠﺩﺍ ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ"Church and Schneider, 1992"ﺍﺸﺘﺭ ﺃﻥﺍﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻙ ﻻ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺘﺨﺼﻴﺹ ﻓﻰ ﹰﺎﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴ ﹰﺍﻤﺤﺩﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﻟﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺍ"Brody and Kaplan, 1996"ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﺴﺒﺏ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻀﻌﻑ ﺍﺸﺘﺍﻟﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﻤﻭﺍﺯﻨﺔ ﻹﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺤﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺭﺍﻜﻬﻡ.ﻭﻭﺠﺩﺍ"Brody and Lowe, 2000"ﺃﻥﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺅﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺯﻭﻥ ﺸﺭﺍﺀ ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺯﻭﻥ ﺒﺘﻘﺎﺩﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺃﺤﻜﺎﻤﻪ. ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﻓﻰ"Harrell, et al. 1989"ﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻴﺯ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺠﺩﻭﺍ ،ﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ ﻤﺘﺤﻴﺯﻴﻥ ﺠﻌﻠﻬﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺠﻬﻭﺩ ﻗﺎﻭﻤﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻟﺭﻏﺒﺔ ﻤﺘﺤﻴﺯﻴﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺱ. ﺍﻟﺘ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻤﺘﺩﺕ ﻭﻗﺩﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺕ ﻰ ﺍﻷﺨﻼﻗﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﻜﻴﺭ ﺍﻷﺨﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)Moral Reasoning(ﻭﺠﺩ ﺤﻴﺙ ، "Buchman, 1983"ﺃﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻓﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺃﻥﻋﻤﻠﻬﻡﺃﻨﻬﻡ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺨﻁﻭﺍﺕ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺃﻨﺠﺯﻭﺍﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻓﻰﺍﻟﺨﻁ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺒﺎﻟﻔﻌﻝ ﺘﻨﺠﺯ ﻟﻡﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻫﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻗﺒﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻟﻠﻜﺫﺏ ﻋﺭﻀﺔ.ﻭﻓﻰ ﻭﺠﺩ ﻤﻤﺎﺜﻠﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ"Berry, et al. 1987"ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﺫﺏ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻨﻭﻨﻴﻴﻥ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﻨﻪ ﺃﻗﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻨﻭﻨﻴﻴﻥ. 19. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ١٩ ﻭﺭﻜﺯﺍ"Church and Schneider, 1995"ﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭ ﻭﺴﻼﻤﺔ ﺩﻗﺔ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ،ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻨﻔﺫﻭﻨﻪ ﻤﺎ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻜﺘﺸﻔﻭﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻟﻸﺨﻁﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻟﻬﺅﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﻊ ﺘﺯﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺒﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻭﺠﺩﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺒﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ. ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻭﻴﺨﻠﺹﺃ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺴﺒﻕ ﻤﻤﺎﻨﻪﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ:ﺃﻭﻻ:ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﻼﻝ)ﺁﺨﺭ ﺒﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ(ﹰﺎﺜﺎﻨﻴ ،ﻟﻠﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻫﺎﻡ ﻜﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ:ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻭﺠﺩﺕﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﹰﺍﻭﺃﺨﻴﺭ ،ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ:ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻷﺨﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﻀﻌﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻟﻴﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺒﻌﺽ ﻗﺩﻤﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻭﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ،ﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﺒﺭﺓ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻋﻀﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻕ. ﻭﻴﺭﻯﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙﺘﻬﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﺘﻭﺴﻴﻊ ﻴﺘﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺒﻤﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻭﻤ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺒﻘﻴﺎﺱﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻡ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻡ ﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﺭﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ.ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻀﻑ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﺒﺎﺩﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺘﻭﻀﻴﺢ ﻟﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑ ﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ،ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻴﺴﻌﻰ ﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﺫﺍﺇﻟﻰﺩﺭﺍﺴﺘﻪ ﻓﻰ ﺘﻐﻁﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ. ٢/٣:ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻭﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ ﻏﻴﺭﻩ ﺩﻋﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻷﺭﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ ﻁﺭﻑ ﻜﻝ ﻴﺨﺩﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﺘﻜﺎﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻓﻰﹸﺘﻓﺍﻟﺩﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻠﺯﻡ ﺒﺄﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻻﺘﺼﺎﻝ ﺒﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﻟﻠﻌﻤﻴﻝ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺘﺴﺘ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﻤﻭﺭ ﻓﻰ ﻭﺫﻟﻙﺩﻤﻬ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻨﺘﺒﺎﻫﻬﻡ ﻋﻰﺎﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻡ.ﻓﺎﻥ ﻭﻜﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻭﺩ ﺒﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺘﻭﺼﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﺇﺼﺩﺍﺭﺍﺕ 20. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٠ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﻤﻊﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﺠﻨﺔﻋﻠ ﻴﺤﺼﻠﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻓﺎﻥ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ،ﻰ ﻤﻬﺎﻤﻬﻡ ﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺘﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ. ﻭﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘﻟﻺﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎﺕﻤﻨﺫ ﺃﻓﻠﺴﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻨﺼﻑ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﻋﺎﻡ١٩٩٦ﻋﺩﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻎ٦٧٣ﺃﻯ ﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭﻩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﻘﺩﻡ ﻟﻡ ،ﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﺒﻝ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺘﻠﻙ ﻓﺸﻝ ﺒﺎﺤﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺘﺤﺫﻴﺭﺍﺕﹰﺎﻨﻅﻴﻔ ﹰﺍﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺒﺸﺄﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺼﺩﺭ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ )IIA, 2002(.ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﺯﺩﺍﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﺤﺠﻡ ﻜﺒﺭ ﻜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺘﺸﻴﺭ ﺘﻜﻭﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﺠﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻌﺏ ﻤﻥ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻜﻠﻤﺎ ،ﻨﺸﺎﻁﻬﺎ ﺘﻌﻘﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔ ﺘﻠﻙ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﺘﻌﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺼﻭﺭﺓﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕﺍﻟﺭﻭﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﻴﻭﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﻜﻭﻥﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑﺒﺎﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ.ﻭﻹﺒﺭﺍﺯ ﺘﻡ ﺫﻟﻙﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗ ﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯﺎﺕﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥﻭﻅﻴﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻭﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻔﺔﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،: ٢/٣/١:ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﻤﻊ ﺍﻷﺨﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻵﻭﻨﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ)Ratcliffe, 2003; Swanson,2007.( ﻗﺩﻴﻡ ﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ )Thurston, 1949(ﻤﻤﺎ ﹰﻼﺘﻜﺎﻤ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﻤﺎ ﺃﺼﺒﺢ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻭﻓﻰ ، ﺒﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺘﻌﻤﻴﻕ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﺴﺘﺩﻋﻰ)Tapestry Networks, 2004 ; Abbott et al. 2007.(ﻋﻠ ﹰﻼﻓﻀ ﻫﺫﺍﺍﻟﺘﻼﻋﺏ ﺍﻜﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺎﺩﺭﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻰ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻓﺎﻨﻪ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻼﻋﺏ ﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻭﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ)Church et al. 2001.(ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻷﻤﺭﻴﻜﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻨﻭﻨﻴﻴﻥﺇﺼﺩﺍﺭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔﺭﻗﻡ)٦٥(ﺘﺸﺠﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ، ﻭﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﺘﺨﻁﻴﻁ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﺄﻨﺸﻁﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻌﺎﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ.ﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﺃﺼﺩﺭ ﻜﻤﺎ)٥٥(ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺘﻠﺯﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ، ﹰﺍﺠﺯﺀ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻓﻬﻡ ﺒﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰﻤﻥ 21. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢١ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ ﻟﺫﺍ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺎﺒﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻓﻬﻡ ) 2002Colbert(. ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭﹰﺍﻭﺍﺤﺩ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﺼﺩﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺃﻫﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺘﺭﻜﺯ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﺠﺭﻴﻬﺎ ﺘﻰ.ﻭﻗﺩ ﺩﻋﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺤﺩﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ)SAS No. 65, AICPA 1991; AS 2, PCAOB, 2004.(ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻴﺅﺜﺭ ﻭﻗﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ،ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻭﻤﺩﻯ ،ﺘﻭﻗﻴﺕ ،ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺅﺜﺭ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻟﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﻨﻔﺫﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭﺍ،ﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻼﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﺩﻟﺔ ﺠﻤﻊ.ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﻋﻨﺩ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻬﺎﻡﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﺩﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﹰﺓﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﹸﻁﻠﺏﺘ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻭ ،ﹰﺎﻤﺴﺒﻘ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﻁﻠﺏ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﻓﻰ ﺘﺩﺨﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﺴﺘﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻴﻁﻠﺏ ﻜﺄﻥ.(ﺃﻋ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﻤﺜﻝﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻁﻰ )٢(ﺃﻋﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺤﻕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺒﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ)AS 2, PCAOB, 2004(. ﻭﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺨ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺭﻜﺯﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ-ﺘﺠﺭﻴﺒﻴﺔ ﻁﺭﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ-ﺒﺎﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡﺘﻠﻌﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ)ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺁﺨﺭ ﺒﻤﻌﻨﻰ)Reliance Decision.((ﻭﻗﺩﻤﺕﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺒﺎﻵﺘﻰ ﺘﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﺘﺼﻭﺭﺍﺕ:)١(ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻴﺄﺨﺫﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ)٢(ﻭ ﻤﺩﻯﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﻋﻠﻴﻪﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ)٣(ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺒﺎﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﺘﺘﺄﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ 22. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٢ ﺃﻥﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻠﻌﺒﻪ.ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻭﻴﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺒﺸﺊ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﻭﺭﺍﺕ: ٢/٣/١/١:ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﺩﺩﺍﺕ ﺘﻭﺠﺩﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ.ﻫﺫﻩ ﻤﻥ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻜﺯﺕ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﻴﺒﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺩﺨﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ"Abdelkhalik, et al. 1983" ﺘﺭ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻊ)ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ(ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺍﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻫﻡ ﻤﻥ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ.ﻭﺠﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺱ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ" Schneider, 1985b" ﺒ ﹰﺔﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻗﻝ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻥﺠﻭﺩﺓﺃﺩﺍﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺀ. ﻭﺠﺩ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﻤﺜﻝ"Margheim, 1986"ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻴﻜﻥ ﻟﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺃﻥﹰﺍﺠﻭﻫﺭﹰﺎﻴﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻓﻰ ،ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺤﻴﻥ ﻓﻰﻟ ﻜﺎﻥﺠﻭﺩﺓﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻭﺃﻫﻠﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀﹰﺍ ﹰﺎﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻓﻰ ﹰﻼﻤﻤﺜﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽﺍﻟﻤﺨﻁﻁﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ.( ﻭﺒﻌﻴﺩﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﻴﺒﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺩﺨﻝ ﻋﻥ ﹰﺍ"Tiessen and Colson, 1990"ﻓﻰ ﻤﻴﺩﺍﻨﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ/ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌ ﻴﺄﺨﺫﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﺭﺸﻴﻔﻴﺔﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻭ ﻭﻥﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﻰ ﻥ ﺤﺩﺩﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﺎﻤﻝ ﻋﺸﺭ ﺍﺜﻨﻰ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺜﻼﺜ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺠﺩﺍ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔﺔﺘﺄﺜﻴ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫﻫﻡ.ﻴﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥ:ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻐﻁﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ)ﺠﻭﺩﺓﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ(ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺌﻤﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺩﺭﺍﺕ ، ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ(ﺍﻟﺩﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻴﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ،ﺨﻠﻴﺔ)ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ.( ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻭﺭﻜﺯﺕ ﻭﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ:ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻝ ﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺒﻴﻥ.ﻓﻭﺠﺩﺍ"Margheim and Label, 1990"ﻤﺩﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺯﺍﺩﺕ ﻜﻠﻤﺎ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺒﻨﺯﺍﻫﺔ ﻴﺘﺄﺜﺭ ﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ 23. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٣ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻜﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻨﺯﺍﻫﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ. ﻭﻭﺠﺩﺍ" Whittington and Margheim ,1993"ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﺃﻥ)Inherent Risk(ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒ ﺍﻷﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻓﻰ ،ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﹰﺎﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴ ﹰﺍﻤﺤﺩﺩ ﻴﻜﻥ ﻟﻡﹰﺍﻤﺤﺩﺩ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﹰﺎﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴ. ﻤﻊ ﺘﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻝ ﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺒﻌﺽ ﻭﺭﻜﺯﺕ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ.ﻓﺄﺸﺎﺭ"Campbell, 1993"ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻝ ﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻰ.ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺽ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻵﺨﺭ)ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻅﺭ:Maletta, 1993; Maletta and Kida, 1993( ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔﻟﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻭﺠﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻝ ﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺘﻭﻗﻑ"Maletta,1993"ﻭ "Maletta and Kida, 1993"ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻥﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺠﻌﺔﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴﺔ)Inherent Risk(ﹰﺎﻤﺭﺘﻔﻌ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎ ﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴﺔ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺠﻤﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ،ﻗﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒ ﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﹰﺎﻤﺭﺘﻔﻌ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺯﻡﻀﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺔ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Maletta, 1993"ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﻓﺎﻥ ﹰﺎﻤﻨﺨﻔﻀ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﻅﻝ ﻓﻰ ﻴﺭﺘﻔﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﻓﻰ ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﹰﺎﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴ ﹰﺍﻤﺤﺩﺩ ﻴﻜﻥ ﻟﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻌﺎﻤﻠﻰ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎﺠﻭﺩﺓﺃﺩﺍﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺀﹰﺍﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﹰﺎﻴﺠﻭﻫﺭﹰﺎﻴ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ. ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺒﻌﺽ ﻭﺭﻜﺯﺕ ،ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰﻓﺄﺸﺎﺭﺕ"Campbell, 1993"ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻟﻠﻌﻤ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﺘﻭﻗﻑﹰﺔﻤﺭﻀﻴ ﻴﻝ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺴﻴﻕ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﻜﻤﺎ ،ﻻ ﺃﻡ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻤﺤﺩﺩﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ.ﻭﻭﺠﺩ"Gramling, 1999"ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺍﻷﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﻟﻀﻐﻁ ﺃﻥ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻴﺯﻴﺩ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺠﻭﻫﺭﻯ ﺍﻷﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﻀﻐﻁ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻴﻝ ﻗﺒﻝ ﻤﻥ. 24. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٤ ٢/٣/١/٢:ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻭﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﻯ ﺘﺼﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻭﻏﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻗﺩﻤﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻭﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﻯ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ.ﻓﻔﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻻﻋ ﺒﻤﺩﻯ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﺘﻤﺎﺩ"Abdelkhalik, et al. 1983"ﺍﻨﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻁﻁﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻨﺴﺒﺔﺒﻠﻎ٣٢,٥%ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻟ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﻭ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﻗﺏ ﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ٤٢%ﻋﻨﺩﻤﺎﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ.ﻭﺠﺩ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﻤﺜﻝ"Schneider ,1985b"ﺴ ﺍﻨﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺃﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻼﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻜﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻁﻁﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ٣٨%ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ، ﺃﻨﺠﺯﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ٣٨%ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻁﻁﺔ.ﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﻋ ﺍﻻﻨﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁﺍﻟﻤﺨﻁﻁﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻥ١٤,٤%ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ، ﺍﻻﻨﺨﻔﺎﺽ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺒﻠﻎ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺘﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ٥٠,٦.%ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻴﺽ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻤﻥ"Margheim, 1986" ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻭﻥ ﻴﺨﻔﺽ ﻻ ﻨﺨﻔﻀﺔﺴ ﺍﺠﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻤﻥ ﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻁﻁﺔ)ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﺩﻡ ﺒﻤﻌﻨﻰ(ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻭ ، ﺒﻤﻌﺩﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻁﻁﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻨﺨﻔﻀﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺘﻔﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ١٨,٧%. ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﻷﺭﺸﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺭﻴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻼﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻜﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﻁﻁﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻴﺘﺭﺍﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ١٥ﻭ٣٠.%ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ"Maletta and Kida, 1993"ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻓﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻼﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻜﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍ ﻟﺤﺴﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺘﻬﻡ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺨﻔﻀﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥﺤﺩﻭﺩ ﻓﻰ ﻟﻌﻤﻼﺀ٢٨%، ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺇﻟﻰ ﹰﺍﺍﺴﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ "Gramling, 1999" ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻨﺨﻔﺽ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﻤﻌﺩﻝ ﺘﺭﺍﻭﺡ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻼﺀ ﺤﺴﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ 25. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٥ ﻭﻅﻴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻼﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻜﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻔﺔ٤%ﻭ٢٢%ﺇﻟﻰ ﹰﺍﺍﺴﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻅﺭﻭﻑ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Felix, et al. 2001"ﻤﻥ ﻤﻜﻭﻨﺔ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﺴﺢ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ١٠٠٠ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻘﺭﺏ ﻤﺎ ﺃﻨﺠﺯﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺘﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ٢٧%ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻋﻠﻴ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺇﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺤﺩﻭﺩ ﻓﻰ ﻬﺎ. ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻟﻴﻝ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻭﻗﺩﻤﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻟﺫﻯﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻭﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻭ ﻥﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﻥ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻜﻝ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺩ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻅﺭ:Margheim, 1986; Whittington and Margheim, 1993; Mills, 1996; Gramling, 1999(، ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﻡ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﺎﻹﻀﺎﻓﺔﻋﻨﺩﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻁﻴﻁ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ)Brody, et al., 1998.( ﺇﺠ ﺒﺒﻌﺽ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺃﺠﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺤﺩﺩ ،"Ward and Robertson, 1980"ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻬﻤﺔ ﻋﺸﺭ ﺇﺤﺩﻯ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ٥٠%ﻭﻅ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺢ ﺸﻤﻠﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﺫﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻥﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ) :١(ﺍﻟﺠﺩﺍﻭﻝ ﺇﻋﺩﺍﺩ/ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ)٢(ﺍﻟﺤﺴﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ)٣( ﺒﺎﻟﻔﺭﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺯﻭﻥ ﺤﺼﺭ)٤(ﺍﻟﻨﻘﺩﻴﺔ ﺠﺭﺩ)٥(ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻷﻗﺴﺎﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻔﺭﻭﻉ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺒﻌﺔ)٦(ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺯﻭﻥ ﺘﺴﻌﻴﺭ)٧(ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻓﺤﺹ)٨(ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺩﻴﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻼﺀ ﺃﺭﺼﺩﺓ)٩(ﺍﻟﺤﺴﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﺭﺼﺩﺓ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ)١٠(ﺍﻟﻤﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺯﻭﻥ ﺤﺼﺭ ﺍﻟﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴﺔ)١١(ﹰﺎﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻨﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺼﻭﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻔﺔ ﺘﺭﺍﻜﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ"Felix, et al. 1998"ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺘﻨﺠﺯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ ﺘﻘﺩﻡ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ.ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﻴﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﺘﻨﺠﺯ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ:)١(٤٧%ﺃﻭ ﻓﻬﻡ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ)٢(٢١%ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ)٣(٤١%ﻤﻥ 26. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٦ ﻤ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕﺍﻷﺭﺼﺩﺓ ﻥ.ﺘﻨﻔﺫ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﹰﺎﻭﺃﻴﻀ ﺍﻟﻤﺭ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﺠﻌﺔﻭﻟﻴﺱ ،ﻭﻤﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ﺩﺍﺌﻤﺔ ﺒﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺒﻐﺭﺽﺍﻟ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭﺓﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ. ٢/٣/١/٣:ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﺎﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙ ﺘﺘﺄﺜﺭ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻌﺔ ﻴﺘﺄﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻭﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻤﺩﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺒﺎﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙ)Involvement(ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ. ﺒﺎﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙ ﺘﺘﺄﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﻭﺙ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰﻤﺜﻝ:ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻭﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﺘﻌﺎﺏ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﻓﻘﺎﻤﺎ"Margheim and Label, 1990"ﺒﻘﻴﺎﺱﻭﻋﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻤﺩﻯ ﹰﺍﻜﺒﻴﺭ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻤﺩﻯ ﺃﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﻏﻡ)ﻋﻠﻰ ﺤﻅﻰ٧ﻤﻥ ﻨﻘﺎﻁ٩ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻤﻥ ﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﻟﻴﻜﺎﺭﺕ(ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻤﻥ ﹰﺍﻭﺍﺤﺩ ﻴﻭﺠﺩ ﻻ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ،)ﻨﺯﺍﻫﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺨﻁﺭ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﺠﺭﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ(ﺍﻟﻤﺭ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻟﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺩﺩﺍﺕ ﻗﺒﻴﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ. ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺒﻌﺽ ﻭﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭﺕ)ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻅﺭ:Elliott and Korpi, 1978; Wallace, 1984; Wallace and Kreutzfeldt, 1991; Stein, et al. 1994; Felix, et al., 2001(ﺍﺸ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻭﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﻤﺭﺍﻭ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺠﻌﺔ/ﺍﻷﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﺃﻭ.ﻓﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻔﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺠﺩﺍ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺒﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ" Wallace and Kreutzfeldt, 1991"ﺃﻨﻪ ﺒﻤﻌﺩﻝ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺘﺯﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺀﺒﻨﺎ ١٠%ﺍﻟ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙ ﻋﺩﻡ ﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﻓﻰﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ.ﻭﻭﺠﺩ"Stein, et al. 1994"ﺃﻥﺍﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙﹰﺍﻤﺤﺩﺩ ﻟﻴﺱ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂﺕ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ،ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺸﺂﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﹰﺎﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺩﻤﺎﺕﺍﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻤ ﻓﺭﻴﻕ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻋﻤﻝ،ﺍﻟﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﺩﺕ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻓﻰ ،ﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺀ. 27. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٧ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﺄﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ"Elliott and Korpi, 1978"ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﻨﺴﺒﺔﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔﻜﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔﻻﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﺄﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒﺅ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴﺔ. ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Wallace, 1984"ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻘﺩﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ١٠%ﻤﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﺘﻌﺎﺏ.ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻘﻴﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺠﺩ"Stein, et al. ,1994"ﻤﺤﺩﺩ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﻻ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺃﻥﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺸﺂﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺩﻤﺎﺕ ﻟﻤﻨﺸﺂﺕ ﺴﻭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻷﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﹰﺎﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋﻴﺔ. ﻭﺠﺩ ﹰﺎﻭﺤﺩﻴﺜ" Felix, et al. 2001"ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻪ ﺘﺴﺎﻫﻡ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺩﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺒﻤﻌﻨﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻷﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﹰﺎﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴ ﹰﺍﻤﺤﺩﺩ ﻴﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺃﻥﻤﺩﻯ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻜﺱ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺎﻫﻤﺔ.ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﺃﻜﺩ" Haron et al. 2004 "ﺃﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻰﺍﻟﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﻤﺎﻟﻴﺯﻴﺎ ﻓﻰﺇﻟﻰﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺅﺩﻯﺇﻟﻰﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Goodwin, 2004"ﺘﻀﻤﻨﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻁﺎﻉ ﺒﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﹰﺎﻤﺴﺤﺍﺴﺘﺭﺍﻟﻴﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺒﻜﻝ ﻟﺨﺎﺹ ﻭﻨﻴﻭﺯﻴﻠﻨﺩﺍﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻰﺘﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﻘﻁﺎﻉ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺇﻟﻰﺃﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺏ ﻭﻴﺭﺠﻊ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻁﺎﻉ ﻓﻰ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﺒﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺇﻟﻰﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺹ ﺒﺎﻟﻘﻁﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﺒﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺃﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺘﻪ ﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻟﻘﻁﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺴﺒﻕ ﻤﻤﺎ ﻭﻨﺨﻠﺹﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺕﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻗﺩﻤﺘﻪ ﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﻫﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻌﺔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻘﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻀﻭﺀ ﺃﻟﻘﺕ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ.ﻫﺫﻩ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻋﺍ ﻭﺃﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻝ ﺨﻁﺭ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺘﻭﻗﻑ ﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻪ ﺘﺴﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﻟﻤﺩﻯ 28. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٨ ﻤﻌﻅﻡ ﻭﺍﺘﻔﻘﺕ ،ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺭﺍﺭ ﻓﻰ ﹰﺎﺃﺴﺎﺴﻴ ﻴﻌﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﻥ ﻴﺯﻴﺩ ﻤﺎ ﺘﻨﺠﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ٢٥% ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻤﻥ. ﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﺕ ﹰﺎﻭﺃﻴﻀﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﹰﺓﻤﺸﻴﺭ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻤﺠﺎﻻﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻜﺎﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ.ﺫﻟﻙ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﻷﻜﺜﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﻥﺒﺼﻔﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺅﻩ ﻴﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭﺓ ﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﻭﻟﻴﺱ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻥ ﻤﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ.ﹰﺍﻭﺃﺨﻴﺭ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﺃﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﺴﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. ﺇﻻﺃﻨﻪﺩﺭﺍﺴ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻻﺎﺕﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺸﺘﺭﺍﻙ ﻜﺎﻥ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭﺕ ﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ)ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺵ ﺤﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﺇﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ(ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ.ﻟﻡ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﻜﻤﺎﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﺘﺨﺘﺒﺭﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺘﻪ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻴﺴﻌﻰ ﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ. ٢/٣/٢:ﻭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔﻤﻥ ﻜﻝﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻋﻥ ﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﹰﺎﺘﺎﺭﻴﺨﻴ ﺍﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻗﻭﺓ ﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﻟﻴﺸﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﺭ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻤﺘﺩ ﻗﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻭﻡ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﻌﺩﻫﺎ ﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻨﺸﻁﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)DeZoort et al. 2002.( ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﻓﺈﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻴﺔ ﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﻴﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﺤﻤﻝ ﻭﻟﻐﺭﺽ ﻜﺄﺤﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﺩﻋﺎﺌﻡﺍ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔﻟﻠﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻓﻰ ﺘﺴﺎﻋﺩﻫﺎ ﻟﺘﻰ )KPMG ACI, 2003.(ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﺃﻜﺩ"Bishop, 2000"ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﺤﻴﺙﺇﻟﻰﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻋﻨﺩ ﹰﺎﺨﺼﻭﺼ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﻥ ﺒﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ 29. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٢٩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﻓﺤﺹ ﻭﻋﻨﺩ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ.ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠ ﻗﺴﻡ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺭﺍﺒﻁ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻭﺃﻨﻪﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺘﻘﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ. ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Hermanson, 2002"ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻤﺘﻭﻗﻊ ﻫﻭ ﻤﺎ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﺴﻭﻑﺘﻌﺯﻴﺯﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺒﻴﻥ ﺒﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ.ﻭﺃﻜﺩﺕﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻔ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺯﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻴﻁﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺎﻋﻝ ﻟﻤﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﻟﻬﺫﺍﻓﻰ ﺃﺴﺎﺴﻰ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻤﻥﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﺔ)Church et al. 2001(.ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺍ"Goodwin and Kent, 2006"ﺇﻟﻰﻴﺘ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻﺒﺩ ،ﻟﻠﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻟﻐﺭﺽ ﺃﻨﻪﺘﻘﻭﻴﺔ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ.ﻜﻤﺎﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﺃﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻤﺭﻴﻜﻰﺍﻟﺘﺄﻜﻴﺩ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺇﻟﻰﻟﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻭﺇﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﺘﻌﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻓﻬﻡ ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺘﻠﻙ ﺓﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ)IIA, 2000(. ﻭﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺍﻹﺭﺸﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺃﻟﻘﺕ ﻭﻗﺩﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻀﻭﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻨﻅﺭ:IIA, 2003c, 2004; KPMG ACI 2003.(ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻨ ﺒﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺠﻴﻝ ﻗﻭﺍﻋﺩ ﺘﺘﻁﻠﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺴﺒﻴﻝﻟﺩﻯ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻸﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻴﻭﻴﻭﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﺒﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻤﻊ ﺘﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻟﻠﺘﻐﻠﺏ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﺘﻌﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺘﻠﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ)SEC, 2003.(ﺍ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺫﻟﻙ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺃﻀﻑﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺭﺍﺡ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺘﺒﻨﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻤﺩ ﻭﺃﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ)IIA, 2003b.(ﻴﺠﺏ ﺤﻴﺙﺃﻥﻴﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭﻴﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ:ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺘﻅﻤﺔ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺼﺭ)Irregularities(ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ، 30. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٠ ﺍﻟﻔ ﻋﺩﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﺀﺓ ﻋﺩﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻗﺩ ،ﺍﻷﺨﻁﺎﺀ ،ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻨﻭﻨﻴﺔ ﻏﻴﺭﻌﻭﻀﻌﻑ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ،ﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ)Colbert, 2002(. ﻭﻤﻥ ﻜﻝ ﻗﺒﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻻﻨﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻷﺨﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﺍﺕ ﻓﻰ:ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ)Treadway Commission(ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ،)Public Oversight Board(ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﻭﺭﺌﻴﺱ ،)SEC Chairman.(ﻟﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﻜﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻟﻤﺘﺩﺍﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻤﻌﻴﺔ ﺸﺠﻌﺕ)NASD(ﻟﻸﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻨﻴﻭﻴﻭﺭﻙ ﻭﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ)NYSE(ﺍﻷﺯﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻴﻁ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ)BRC(ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ.ﻤﻥ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻴﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﹰﺍﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺍﻷﺯﺭﻕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻴﻁ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺃﺼﺩﺭﺕ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻜﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﻥ ﻭﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﻬﺩﻑ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺩﻋﻡ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ )Raghunandan et al. 2001(. ﻭﻗﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭ ﺩ"Carcello, et al. 2002"ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻭﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻤﻴﺜﺎﻕ ﻴﺘﻀﻤﻨﻪ ﻤﺎ ﻭﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺇﻓﺼﺎﺡ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ.ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺒﻔﺤﺹ ﺘﻬﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﺒﺎﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻭﻭﺠﺩﻭﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭ ﻤﻊ ﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﺍﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﺒﻌﻘﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﹰﺎﻭﺃﻴﻀ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻨﻅﺭﺍﺌﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻸﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻨﻴﻭﻴﻭﺭﻙ ﺒﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺠﻠﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻊ ﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﺍﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻋﻘﺩ ﻓﻰ ﺒﺎﻟﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﻤﺴﺠﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﻴﺭ. ﻭﺃﺠﺭﻯ"Chahill, 2006"ﺃﺤﺩ ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻻﻴﺭﻟﻨﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺼ ﺒﻨﻭﻙﻋﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺴﻨﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺭ ﻓﺘﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﻏﻁﺕ ،ﺃﻴﺭﻟﻨﺩﺍ ﺒﺠﻤﻬﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﺔ ١٩٩٨ﺒﻌﺽ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻻﻴﺭﻟﻨﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻀﺎﻴﺎ ﺨﻼﻟﻬﺎ ﹸﻌﺕﻓﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ، ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﺕ.ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺘﻬﺩﻑﺇﻟﻰﻭﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻤﻜﻭﻨ ﻤﻥ ﺒﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺎﺕ)Internal Corporate Governance(ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﻋﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺍﻜﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻯ ، ،ﻭﺍﻷﺘﻌﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻭﺍﺌﺩ ﺍﺤﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻭﺩﺍﺌﻊ ﻟﻌﻤﻼﺀ ﺍﻟﻀﺭﻴﺒﻰ ﻜﺎﻟﺘﻬﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻏﻁﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺭﺓ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻭﻗﻌﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ١٩٨٨ﺇﻟﻰ١٩٩٨.ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩﺕ 31. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣١ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﺒﻨﻙ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﺘﻀﻤﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﻓﻭﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻴﺎ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﻤﻔﺘﺸﻰ ﻗﺒﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﻭﺭﺓ.ﻜﺸﻔﺕ ﻭﻗﺩ ﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺃﺩﻭﺍ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻭﻅﻔﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺘﻘﺎ ﻭﺭﻓﻌﻭﺍ ﻤﺭﻀﻴﺔﻟﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺼﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﺭﻴﺭﻫﻡﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ،ﺇﻻ ﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺘﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺭ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻁﻠﻭﺏ ﺒﺎﻟﻘﺩﺭ ﻴﻜﻥ ﻟﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﺘﺼﺎﻟﻬﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺭﺒﻊ ﻤﻠﺨﺼﺔ.ﻫﺫﺍ ﻴﺭﺠﻊ ﻭﻗﺩﺇﻟﻰﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻟﻠﺒﻨﻙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺃﻭﻟﻭﻴﺔ ﺘﻌﻁﻰﻟﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓﻟﺠﻨ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺴﻠﺒﻴﺎ ﺍﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻏﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﻭﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺒﺎﻜﺘﺸﺎﻑ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺒﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﻨﻙ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ.ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺒﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺃﻭﺼﺕ ﻭﻤﺠﻠﺱ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ. ﺍﻟﻭﻓﺎﺀ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺘﺩﻋﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻭﺍﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻭﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﻫﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻓﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺒﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﻴﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﻠﻘﺔ ﺃﻨﺸﻁﺘﻬﺎ ﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﻭﻓﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺒﺎﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ)ﺘﻘﺩﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻴﺭ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡ.(ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺘﻌﺯﺯ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻓﺎﻥ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ﻭﺒﻼ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﻌﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺘﺩﻋﻡ ﺒﺩﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﻤﻠﻴ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺸﻙﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺎﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴ ﺘﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﺔ )Beasley et al. 2000.( ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺍﺤﺩﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﺒﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻓﻰ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﻥ ﻴﻨﺒﺜﻕ)Cohen et al. 2002(ﻟﻸ ﻨﻴﻭﻴﻭﺭﻙ ﺒﺒﻭﺭﺼﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺠﻴﻝ ﻗﻭﺍﻋﺩ ﻓﺎﻥ ،ﺒﻴﻥ ﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺘﺘﻁﻠﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﻭﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﺒﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺒﻤﺩ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ)SEC, 2003.(ﻤﺎ ﺘﺼﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﻓﺎﻥ ﹰﺎﻭﺃﻴﻀ ﻭﺍﻹ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻰﺃﻥ ﺘﻘﺘﺭﺡ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺓ 32. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٢ ،ﺘﻨﻔﺫﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻷﻨﺸﻁﺔ ﻋﻥ ﻟﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﹰﺎﺩﻭﺭﻴ ﺘﻔﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺠﺏ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﺔ ﺨﻁﺘﻬﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻨﺠﺎﺯﻩ ﺘﻡ ﻭﻤﺎ ،ﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﻴﺎﺘﻬﺎ ،ﺴﻠﻁﺎﺘﻬﺎ.ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﺘﻔﺼﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻴﺠﺏ ﻜﻤﺎ ﻗﻀﺎﻴﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﺘﻌﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﻫﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺸ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻭﺘﺤﺘﺎﺠﻬﺎ ﺘﻁﻠﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻷﻤﻭﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻭﻏﻴﺭﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻜﺎﺕ)Performance Standard 2060, IIA, 2003b.(ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﻴﺘﺴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻭﻗﻊ ﻭﻤﻥ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺎﻋﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻟﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺭﻴﻌﺎﺕ ﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ )IIA, 2003b(. ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭ"Whitely, 2005 "ﺇﻟﻰﺃﻥﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﺃﺼﺒﺤﺕ ﻤﻀﻰ ﻭﻗﺕ ﺃﻯ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻌﺘﻤﺩﻟﻤﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ، ،ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﺓ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻓﻰ ﻤﺤﻭﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥﻭﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ.ﻭﻗﺩ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﻥ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥﻟﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓﻭﻤﺠﻠﺱﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺒﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﻴﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﻭﻓﺎﺀ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ: -ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﻟﻠﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺫﺍﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻓﻰ. -ﻟﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕﻭﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. -ﻓ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙﺍﻟﻤﺩﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻠﻔﺔ ﺘﺨﻔﻴﺽ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺯﺍﻡ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﻓﻀﻝ ﺭﺹ ﺍﻟﻁﻭﻴﻝ. -ﻗﻭﺍﻋﺩ ﻓﺤﺹﻭﺁﺩﺍﺏﺒﺎﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺍﻷﺨﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻭﻙﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻜﻔﺎﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻤﻥ ﻟﻠﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﻠﻐﺕﺒ ﻗﺩ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻤﻥ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻬﺩﻑ. -ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻌﻨﺎﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫﻭﺇﻋﺩﺍﺩﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺭﻓﻊ ﺒﺎﻟﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺘﻘﺭﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. -ﻤﺭﺍﻋﺎﺓﺍﻹﻓﺼﺎﺡﻋﻨﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻔﺎﻓﻴﺔﺇﻋﺩﺍﺩﺍﻟﺴﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺨﻁﺔ ﻭﺘﻨﻔﻴﺫ. 33. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٣ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻭﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭﻤﻥ ﻜﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓﻤﻥﺯﺍﻭﻴﺔ،ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔﹰﺎﻤﺴﺤ ﻤﻌﻅﻤﻬﺎ ﻓﻰ ﻭﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ.ﻗﻠﺔ ﺃﺩﻯ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﻁﺒﻊﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺍﻟﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑ ﺼﻌﻭﺒﺔ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﻰ ﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ ﺒﻜﺎﻓﺔﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻜﻝﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ.ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺭﺕ ﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻭﻻ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻴﺴﻌﻰ ﻤﺎ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﺍﺭﺓﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺘﻪ. ٣-ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﻭﻓﺭﻭﺽ ﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺼﺩﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥﺍﻟﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺭﺡ ﻟﺍﻵﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻴﺘﻀﺢ ﻜﻤﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ: ﺘﺤﺴﻴ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﻟﻠﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺘﺭﺡ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ. ﺍﻟﻤﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺔ Objectivity ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ Competence ﺔﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺣﻮﻛﻤ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺔﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﻇﻴﻔ ﺔﺍﻟﻤﺮﺍﺟﻌ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺧﻠﻴﺔ ﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺃﺩﺍء ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ Quality of Work Performance ﺪﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺍﻟﺠﻴ ﻣﻊ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺃﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﻛﻤﺔ 34. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٤ ﺃﺭﺒﻌﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺩﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﻤﻭﺫﺝ ﻤﻥ ﻴﺘﻀﺢ ﻫﻰ ﻤﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ:ﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻓﻰ ﺩﺍﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﻭﻴﺒﻴﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﻴﻠﻰ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﺭﻭﺽ ﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻭﺒﺫﻟﻙ: ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ:ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ:ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ. ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ:ﺘﻭﺠﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ. ﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ:ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﺎﻗﻰﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ. ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻤﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ:ﻭﻅ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺘﻭﺠﺩﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ. ٤-ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻴﺘﻤﺜﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙ ﻫﺩﻑ ﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕﺍﻟﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻭﻗﻭﻑﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ، ،ﻤﺼﺭ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕﺍﻟ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﺘﻡﺍﻟﺘﺎﻟﻰ ﻨﺤﻭ: ٤/١:ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻷﺸﺨﺎﺹ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺘﻬﺎ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﻰ ﺭﻭﻋﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻟﺩﻴﻬﻡ ﺘﺘﻭﺍﻓﺭ ﺍﻟﺫﻴﻥﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺘﻀﻤﻨﺕ ﻟﺫﺍ١٢٨ﻴﻠﻰ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺘﻭﺯﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓ:٣٤ﻤﺩﻴ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺭﻯ ،ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻤﺼﺭ ﺠﻤﻬﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ٣٦ﻤﻥ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺒﺘﻠﻙﻭ ،٥٨ﺒﻤﻜﺎﺘﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺸﺭﻜﺎﺀ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. 35. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٥ ٤/٢:ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﺠﻤﻊ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﺠﻤﻊ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ. ﻟﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﹰﺎﻭﻓﻘ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﺃﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﺘﺼﻤﻴﻡ ﺘﻡ ﻭﻗﺩ"ﻟﻴﻜﺎﺭﺕ"،ﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺴﺕ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻟﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺤﺘﻰ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ.ﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ﺘﻡ ﻭﻗﺩ١٥٠ ﺍﺴﺘﻼﻡ ﻭﺘﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ١٣٤ﻗﺎﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺴﺘﺒﻌﺩ ،ﺍﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﺌﻤﺔ٦ ﺒﺎﻟﻜﺎﻤﻝ ﺍﺴﺘﻴﻔﺎﺌﻬﺎ ﻟﻌﺩﻡ ﻗﻭﺍﺌﻡ.ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻗﻭﺍﺌﻡ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻭﺒﺫﻟﻙ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺕ١٢٨ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﻤﺜﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻭﻫﻰ ،ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ.ﻭﻗﺩ ﻫﺫﺍﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙﺍﻟﻤﻘﺎﺒﻼﺕ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ،ﺍﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔﻤﻤﺎ ﻤﻜﻨﻪﻤﻔﺎﻫﻴﻡ ﺃﻱ ﺘﻭﻀﻴﺢ ﻤﻥﻜﺎﻨﺕﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﻴﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻓﻲ ﻏﺎﻤﻀﺔ. ٤/٣:ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻟﻴﺏ ﻟﻐﺭﺽﻓﺭﻭﺽ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﻟﺒﺤﺙﺍﻷﺴﺎﻟﻴﺏ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺘﻡ ، ﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻟﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ: ١-ﺍﻻﻨ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺠﻲ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩ ﺤﺩﺍﺭ:ﻤﺩﻯ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺘﻡ ﺘﺄﺜﺭﺠﻭﺩﺓﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﺍﻷﺭﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﺘﺎﺒﻊ ﻜﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ:ﺍﻷﻫﻠﻴﺔ،ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ،ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ،ﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺍﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑﺤﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻜﻝ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،. ٢-ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻁ: ﺘﻡ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺘﺄﺜﺭ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔﺘﺎﺒﻊ ﻜﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺒﺠﻭﺩﺓﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﻤﺴﺘﻘﻝ ﻜﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭ. ٣-ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ"KruskalWallis: "ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭﻫﻭﻻﻤﻭﺘﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻤﻊ ﻴﺘﻔﻕ ﻌﻠﻤﻰ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻻﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﻤﺩﻯ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺒﻐﺭﺽ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻤﻪﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ)،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﺸﺭﻜﺎﺀ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻤﻜﺎﺘﺏ.( ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﻖ ﺃﻧﻈﺮ)۲.( 36. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٦ ٤/٤:ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡﺍﻷﺴﺎﻟﻴﺏﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺘﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺫﻜﺭ ﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻵﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺤﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ : ﹰﻻﺃﻭ:ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺘﺸﻴﺭ ،ﻟﻼﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻰ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﺅﺍﻟﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ"KruskalWallis"ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ.ﻭﻴﺅﻜﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺫﻟﻙﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺤﺩﻫﺎ ﺘﻔﺴﺭ٢٤,٢%ﻭ٢٥,٥%ﻭ٢٦,٤%ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺍﺠﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻤﻥﺠﻭﺩﺓﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﻤﻥ ﻜﻝ ﻨﻅﺭ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻤﻥ:ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯ، ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺼﺩﻕ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﺸﺭﻜﺎﺀ ، ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ.ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭﺃﻥﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰﺘﺘﺤﺩﺩﻤﻥﺨﻼﻝﺍﻵﺘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺼﺭ: ١-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺤﺼﻝ ﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ. ٢-ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺭﺓﻭﺇﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺒﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻨﺎﻋ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺔﺔﺒﻬﺎ ﺘﻌﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ. ٣-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺤﺼﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ. ٤-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ ﺍﻹﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ. ٥-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺄﻫﻴﻝ. ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺘﺅﺩﻯﺍﻟﻤ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓﺴﺘﻭﻯ ،ﺨﺒﺭﺘﻪ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻰﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ ﻭﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺤﺭﻓﻴﺘﻪ ،ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻭﻜﻭﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺃﺩﺍﺌﻪ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺎﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻫﻴﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺒﺎﻟﺘﺒﻌﻴﺔ ﹰﺎﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ. ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﻖ ﺃﻧﻈﺮ)۱.( 37. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٧ ﹰﺎﺜﺎﻨﻴ:ﺍ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺘﻡ ﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺘﺸﻴﺭ ،ﻟﻼﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﺍﻟﺴﺅﺍﻟﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ"KruskalWallis"ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ. ﻭﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻴﺅﻜﺩﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥﻭﺤﺩﻫﺎ ﺘﻔﺴﺭ٢٣,١%ﻭ٢٤,٤%ﻭ٢٥,٨%ﺍﺠﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻤﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﻨﻅﺭ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﺼﺩﻕ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ.ﻭﺘﻔﺴﻴﺫﻟﻙ ﺭﺃﻥ ﺘﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔﺨﻼﻝ ﻤـﻥ: ۱ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺘﻘﺎﺭﻴﺭ ﺭﻓﻊ. ۲ﻋﻨﻬﻡ ﻭﺍﻻﺴﺘﻐﻨﺎﺀ ﻭﺘﺭﻗﻴﺘﻬﻡ ﻭﻤﻜﺎﻓﺂﺘﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺘﻌﻴﻴﻥ ﺒﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ. ۳ﻓ ﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻗﻴﺎﻡﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻰ. ﺃﺩﺍﺌﻬﻡ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻭﺤﻴﺎﺩ ﻭﻨﺯﺍﻫﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﹰﺎﻤﻬﻤ ﹰﻼﻋﺎﻤ ﺘﻌﺩ ﻜﻁﺭﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺎﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ. ﹰﺎﺜﺎﻟﺜ:ﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﻭﺘﺸﻴﺭ ،ﻟﻼﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺱ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻤﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﺅﺍﻟﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ"KruskalWallis"ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﺫﻟ ﻭﻴﺅﻜﺩﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻙﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝﻭﺤﺩﻫﺎ ﺘﻔﺴﺭ٣٢,١%ﻭ٣٠,٧%ﻭ٢٩,٧%ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺍﺠﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻤﻥﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﻨﻅﺭ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﺼﺩﻕ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ.ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭﺃﻥﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓﻋﻤﻝ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺘﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ: 38. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٨ ١-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﺭﺍﻤﺞ ﻭﻜﻔﺎﻴﺔ ﺩﻗﺔ. ٢-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﻭﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻜﻔﺎﻴﺔ. ٣-ﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻨﺎﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺒﺫﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. ٤-ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺩﻋﻡ. ٥-ﻓﺤﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻭﺫﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺨﺎﺭﺝ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺹ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ. ﻤﻥ ﹰﺎﻤﻬﻤ ﹰﺎﻁﺭﻓ ﺒﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹰﺎﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴ ﺘﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ. ﹰﺎﺭﺍﺒﻌ:ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺘﺸﻴﺭ ،ﻟﻼﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺅﺍﻟﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ"KruskalWallis"ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ.ﻨﺘ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﻴﺅﻜﺩﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﺎﺌﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩﻴﻔﺴﺭ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝﻭﺤﺩﻩ٢٠,٦%ﻭ٢١,٦% ﻭ١٨,١%ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺍﺠﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻤﻥﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓﻨﻅﺭ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﺼﺩﻕ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ.ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭﺃﻥﻟﻭﻅ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻴﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻯ: ١-ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡﻭﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔﺘﺴﺎﻋﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﺠﻨﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻴﺔ ﻤﻬﺎﻤﻬﺎ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻓﻰ. ٢-ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡﻭﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔﻓﻰ ﺘﺴﺎﻋﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﻟﻺﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ،ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺨﻁﻴﻁﺍﻟﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ،ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ. ٣-ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﻡﻭﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﺒﺸﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﺘﻭﺍﺠﻬﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ. 39. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٣٩ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻭﻗﺘﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﻭﺼﻴﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﻟﻸﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔﻜﻤﺎﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﻡﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﹰﺎﺃﻴﻀ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻨﻅﺭ ﻭﺠﻬﺎﺕﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴﺤﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻴﺔ ﻓﻰﹰﺎﻁﺭﻓ ﺒﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ. ﹰﺎﺨﺎﻤﺴ:ﺘﺤﻠﻴ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻤﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭﻤﻔﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﻝ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺴﻊ ﺍﻟﺴﺅﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺸﺭ،ﻭﺍﻟﺤﺎﺩﻯﻋﺸﺭ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻭﺘﺸﻴﺭ ،ﻟﻼﺴﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ"KruskalWallis"ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔﻭﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ.ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﻴﺅﻜﺩﺃﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻁ ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺘﻔﺴﺭ٩٤,٨%ﻭ٩٠,٨٦%ﻭ٩٣,٦%ﺍﺠﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻤﻥ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻐﻴﺭﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﻨﻅﺭ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻤﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﺼﺩﻕ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻭﺍﻟﻰ.ﺫﻟﻙ ﻭﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭﺃﻥ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥﺍﻟﺩ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﻭﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﺘﻌﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻭﺘﺩﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﻜﻤﺎ ، ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩﹰﺎﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ. 40. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٠ ٥-ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻟﺨﻼﺼﺔ ﺤﺎ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﻊﺇﻓﻼﺱ ﻻﺕﺇﻓﻼﺱ ﺇﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺘﺒﻴﻥ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺔ ﻤﺅﺸﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﺯﺍﺩﺕ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺘﻠﻙ.ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺔ ﻭﻴﺘﻡ ﻫﻰ ﺘﻌﺎﻭﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺘﺭﺒﻁﻬﺎ ﺃﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺃﺭﺒﻌﺔ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ:ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ،ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﺠﻠﺱ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﻨﺔ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻰﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ.ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺭﻏﻡ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﹰﺎﻤﻌﻴﻨ ﹰﺍﺩﻭﺭ ﺘﺤﺩﺩ ﻟﻡ ﺍﻟﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﻨﻭﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺼﺩﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻜﺩﺕ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﻻ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻓﻰﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺘﻌﺎﻭﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺌﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺨﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺙ ﻭﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ.ﻓﺎﻥ ﺜﻡ ﻭﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﻗﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ. ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻭﻗﻭﻑ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﺫﻩ ﻭﺘﻬﺩﻑﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻤﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺎﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ.ﺃﺠﺭﻴﺕ ﺍﻟﻬﺩﻑ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻭﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻤ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔﻤﻥ ﻜﻭﻨﺔ١٢٨ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓﻴﻠﻰ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺘﻭﺯﻴﻌﻬﺎ:٣٤ﻤﻥ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓ ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ،ﺍﻟﻌﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻤﺼﺭ ﺠﻤﻬﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻟﺒﻌﺽ ٣٦ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓﻤﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀﻭ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺒﺘﻠﻙ٤٥ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺸﺭﻜﺎﺀ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻔﺭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﻤﻜﺎﺘﺏ.ﺒ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﻭﺒﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝﺍﻷﺴﺎﻟﻴﺏ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻵﺘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺇﻟﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺘﻭﺼﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ: ١-ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ)ﻤﺩﻴﺭﻯﺃﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﺠﺎﻥ ﺭﺅﺴﺎﺀ ،ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﺸﺭﻜﺎﺀ ،(ﺼﺩﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽﺃﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔﺃ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻫﻠﻴﺔ ،ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺄﻫﻴﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﻭﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ. 41. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤١ ٢-ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽ ﺼﺩﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻨﻰ،ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔﺃﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓﻥ ﺘ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻰ ﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ. ٣-ﺼﺩﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽﺃﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺨﻁﺔ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺩﻋﻡ ،ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻨﺎﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺒﺫﻝ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﻓﺤﺹ ،ﺍﻟﻼﺯﻤﺔ ﺒﺎﻟﻤﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. ٤-ﺍﻟ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩﺼﺩﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺭﺍﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽﺃﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔﻟﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ،ﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻴﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺫﻯ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﺘﺒﺎﺩﻝﻭﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔﺒﻴﻨﻬﻡ ﻓﻴﻤﺎﻭﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ. ٥-ﺼﺩﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﺘﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻟﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﺨﺎﻤﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺭﺽﺃﻥ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺨﺎﻁﺭ ﻭﺘﺩﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺸﺄﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺭﻗﺎﺒﺔ ﺇﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺒﺎ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺍﻟﻰ ﻴﺅﺩﻯ ﻜﻤﺎ ،ﻟﻬﺎ ﺘﺘﻌﺭﺽﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻗﻰ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻬﺎﻴﺔ ﻓﻰ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻤﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ. ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕ ﻭﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺨﻠﺼﺕ ﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺀﻭﺒﻨﺎ ﻴﻠﻰ ﺒﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻴﻭﺼﻰ ،ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ: 42. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٢ -ﺩﻭﺭ ﺘﻔﻌﻴﻝﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔﺍﻟﻤﺼﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﻓﻰﺨﻼﻝ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ، ﺘﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻝ ﺴﻭﻕ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺄﻜﻴﺩﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻗﺴﻡﺍﻟﻤﻘﻴﺩﺓ ﺒﺎﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺒﺴﻭﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻝ ﺃﺴﻭﺍﻕ ﻤﻥ ﺒﻐﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﺃﺴﻭﺓ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،. -ﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻝ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﻠﺤﺔ ﺃﺼﺤﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻭﺍﻤﻝ ﺘﻭﺍﻓﺭ ﻤﻭﻀﻭ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻜﺄﻫﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ،ﻋﻴﺘﻬﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﺠﻴﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﻋﻝ ،ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻋﻤﻝ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺒﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻭﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺭﻜﺎﺕ ﺤﻭﻜﻤﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﺸﺄﻨﻪ ﻤﻥ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ،ﺫﻟﻙ. -ﻟﺩﻴﻬﻡ ﺘﺘﻭﺍﻓﺭ ﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﺔ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻓﺤﺹ ﺍﻟﺨﺒﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﻟﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺫﻟﻙ ،ﺍﻟﺨﺎﺭﺠﻴﻴﻥ ﻜﺎﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺠﺎﻝ ﻫﺫﺍ ﻓﻰ ﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻤﺭﻀﻰ ﺒﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ. -ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﺸﺎﻜﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﻬﺩ ﺇﻨﺸﺎﺀ ﻟﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻼﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺇﺼﺩﺍﺭ ﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺘﻘﻊ ،ﺍﻷﻤﺭﻴﻜﻰ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﻁﺒﻴﻕﻤﺼﺭ ﻓﻰ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﻴﻥ ﻭﺘﺄﻫﻴﻝ ﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ ،ﻤﺼﺭ ﺸﻬﺎﺩ ﻭﻤﻨﺢ ،ﹰﺎﻋﺎﻟﻤﻴ ﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﺠﺩﺍﺕ ﻟﻴﻭﺍﻜﺒﻭﺍﺓﺍﻟﺩﺍﺨﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻨﻭﻨﻰ))CIA(Certified Internal Auditor.( 43. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٣ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ Abbott, L., S.Parker, Peters, G., and Rama, D. 2007. Corporate Governance, Audit Quality, and the SarbanesOxley Act: Evidence from Internal Audit Outsourcing. The Accounting Review. Sarasota: Vol. 82, Iss. 4; p. 803 (33 pages). Abdel khalik, A. R., D. Snowball, and J. H. Wragge. 1983. The effects of certain internal audit variables on the planning of external audit programs. The Accounting Review (April): 215 227. Ahlawat , Sunita S. and D. Jordan Lowe . 2004. An examination of internal auditor objectivity: in-house versus outsourcing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Sept) 23.2: p147 (13). Allegrini, M. and D'Onza, G. 2003. Internal auditing and risk assessment in large Italian companies: an empirical survey. International Journal of Auditing , Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 191 208. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AlCPA). 1975. The Effect of an Internal Audit Function on the Scope of the Independent Auditor's Examination. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 9. New York, NY: AlCPA. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 1991. The Auditors' Consideration of the Internal Audit Function in an Audit of Financial Statements. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 65. New York, NY: AICPA. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). 2003. Statements on Auditing Standards. New York, NY: AICPA. Antoine, R. 2004. Internal audit: Spotlight shines on its new role. http://accounting.smartpros.com/x45449.xml. 44. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٤ Arena, A. and G. Azzone. 2005. Development trends and future prospects of internal audit. Managerial Auditing Journal. Bradford: Vol.12, Iss. 4/5; pg. 200. Bailey, A. D., Jr., A. A. Gramling, and S. Ramamoorti, editors. 2003. Research Opportunities in Internal Auditing. Altamonte Springs, FL: Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. Beasley, M. S., J. V. Carcello, D. R. Hermanson, and P. D. Lapides. 2000. Fraudulent financial reporting: consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons (December) : 441 454. Berry, L.E., G.B. Harwood, and J.L. Katz. 1987. Performance of auditing procedures by governmental auditors: Some preliminary evidence. The Accounting Review (January): 14 28. Bishop, William, .2000 . Committee. Internal Auditor , April pp. 50 51. Brody, R.G. and S.E. Kaplan. 1996. Escalation of commitment among internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Spring): 1 15. Brody, R. G., S. P. Golen, and P. M. J. Reckers. 1998. An empirical investigation of the interface between internal and external auditors. Accounting and Business Research (Summer): 160 171. Brody, R.G. and D.J. Lowe. 2000. The new role of the internal auditor: implications for internal auditor objectivity. International Journal of Auditing . Vol. 4: 169 176. Brown, P. R. 1983. Independent auditor judgment in the evaluation of internal audit functions. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 444 455. Brown, P. R., and V. Karan. 1986. One approach for assessing the operational nature of auditing standards: An analysis of SAS 9. Auditing: A Journal of Practice . Vol. 6. No. 1. (Fall): 134 147. 45. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٥ Buchman, T.A. 1983. The reliability of internal auditors' working papers. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 92 103. Cahill , E. 2006. Audit committee and internal audit effectiveness in a multinational bank subsidiary: A case study, Journal of Banking Regulation. London: Vol.7, Iss. 1/2; pg. 160, 20 pgs. Campbell, A. 1993. Internal audit reliance in the continuing audit engagement. Internal Auditing (Summer): 56 66. Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., and T. L. Neal. 2002. Disclosures in audit committee charters and reports. Accounting Horizons 16 (4): 291 304. Church, B.K.. and A. Schneider. 1992. Internal auditor involvement in internal control systems design: Is objectivity impaired? Journal of Applied Business Research (Fall): 15 24. Church, B.K., and A. Schneider. 1995. Internal auditors' memory for financialstatement errors. Behavioral Research in Accounting : 17 36. Church, B.K., JJ. McMillan, and A. Schneider. 2001. Factors affecting internal auditors' consideration of fraudulent financial reporting during analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (March): 65 80. Clark, M., T. E. Gibbs, and R. B. Schroeder. 1980. Evaluating internal audit departments under SAS No. 9: Criteria for judging competence, objectivity, and performance. The Woman CPA . (July): 8 11,22. Clark, M. E., T. E. Gibbs, and R. G. Schroeder. 1981. CPAs judge internal audit department objectivity. Management Accounting . (February): 40 43. Cohen, J., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A, M. Wright. 2002. Corporate governance and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research (Winter): 573 594. 46. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٦ Colbert, J.L. 2002. Corporate governance: Communications from internal and external auditors, Managerial Auditing Journal, Bradford: Vol.17, Iss. 3; pg. 147, 6 pgs. DeZoort, F. T., R. W. Houston, and M. F. Peters. 2001. The impact of internal auditor compensation and role on external auditors' planning judgments and decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research (Summer): 257 281. DeZoort, F. T., D. R. Hermanson, D. S. Archambeault, and S. A. Reed. 2002. Audit committee effectiveness: a synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature : 38 75. Downes, D. 2004. The European perspective on corporate governance. Accountancy Ireland. Dublin: Vol.36, Iss. 6; pg. 25, 1 pgs. Edge, W. R., and A. A. Parley. 1991. External auditor evaluation of the internal audit function. Accounting and Finance : 69 83. Elliott, R. K. and A. R. Korpi. 1978. Factors affecting audit fees, Appendix Commission on Auditors' Responsibilities. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Auditing Research Study No. 3 by Melvin F. Shakun (AICPA). Felix, W. L. Jr., A. A. Gramling, and M. J. Maletta. 1998. Coordinating Total Audit Coverage: The Relationship Between Internal and External Auditors. Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors. Inc. Felix, W. L. Jr., A. A. Gramling, and M. J. Maletta. 2001. The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of external audit fees and factors influencing this contribution. Journal of Accounting Research (December): 513 534. 47. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٧ Gibbs, T. E. and R. G. Schroeder. 1979. Evaluating the competence of internal audit departments. In Symposium on Auditing Research HI. Urbana : University of Illinois: 207 225. Goodwin, J. 2004. A comparison of internal audit in the private and public sectors. Managerial Auditing Journal. Bradford: Vol.19, Iss. 5; pg. 640. Goodwin, J. and Pamela Kent . 2006. The use of internal audit by Australian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal. Bradford: Vol.21, Iss. 1/2; pg. 81, 21 pgs. Gordon, L. A., and K .J. Smith. 1992. Post auditing capital expenditures and firm performance: The role of asymmetric information. Accounting, Organizations and Society (November): 741 757. Gramling , A. A. 1999. External auditors' reliance on work performed by internal auditors: The influence of fee pressure on this reliance decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Supplement): 117 135. Gramling, A. A., and P. M. Myers. 1997. Practitioners' and users' perceptions of the benefits of certification of internal auditors. Accounting Horizons 11(1): 39 53. Hansen, S. C. 1997. Designing internal controls: The interaction between efficiency wages and monitoring. Contemporary Accounting Research 14(1): 129 163. Haron, H., Andrew Chambers, Rozaldy Ramsi and Ishak Ismail, .2004. The reliance of external auditors on internal auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal. Bradford: Vol.19, Iss. 8/9; pg. 1148. Harrell, A., M. Taylor, and E. Chewning. 1989. An examination of management's ability to bias the professional objectivity of internal auditors. Accounting, Organizations and Society 14( 3): 259 269. Hermanson, D. R. 2002. The growing stature of internal auditing. Internal Auditing (November / December): 43 44. 48. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٨ Hermanson, D. R. and L. E. Rittenberg. 2003. Internal audit and organizational governance. Chap, in Research Opportunities in Internal Auditing, edited by Bailey, A. D., Jr., A. A. Gramling, and S. Ramamoorti. Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. Hermanson, D. 2006. Internal auditing: getting beyond the section 404 implementation crisis, Internal Auditing. Boston: Vol.21, Iss. 3; pg. 39, 3 pgs. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). 2000. Internal Auditing: Adding Value across the Board, Corporate Brochure, ILL. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). 2002. Internal auditors: integral to good corporate governance. Internal Auditor 59.4 : p44(5). From InfoTrac OneFile. Institute of Internal Auditors. 2003a. Simply Good Business. Tone at the Top (August). Altamonte Springs, FL (IIA). Institute of Internal Auditors (ILA). 2003b. International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Altamonte Springs, FL. http://www.theiia.org/ecm/guide-frame.cfm?doc_id=1499. Institute of Internal Auditors. 2003c. The IIA's position statement on audit committees. Altamonte Springs, FL (IIA). Institute of Internal Audit ors. 2004. Tone at the Top. (Feb): 2 3. Altamonte Springs, FL (ILA). KPMG Audit Committee Institute (ACI). 2003. Audit Committee Roundtable Highlights (Spring): Building a Framework for Effective Audit Committee Oversight. Krishnamoorthy, G. 2001. A cascaded inference model for evaluation of the internal audit report. Decision Sciences (Summer): 499 520. 49. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٤٩ Krishnamoorthy, G. 2002. A multistage approach to external auditors' evaluation of the internal audit function. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21.1 (March 2002): p95(28). Liu, T. 2005. The Case Analysis on Failures of Enterprise Internal Control in Mainland China. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge. Hollywood: Vol.7, Iss. 1; pg. 92, 7 pgs. Maletta, M. J. 1993. An examination of auditors' decisions to use internal auditors as assistants: The effect of inherent risk. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 508 525. Maletta, M. J. and T. Kida. 1993. The effect of risk factors on auditors' configure information processing. The Accounting Review (July): 681 691. Margheim, L. L. 1986. Further evidence on external auditors' reliance on internal auditors. Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 194 205. Margheim, L., and W. Label. 1990. External auditor reliance on internal auditors when audit risk is high: Some empirical findings. Advances in Accounting (Vol. 8): 293 311. Messier, W. F., Jr., and A. Schneider. 1988. A hierarchical approach to the external auditor's evaluation of the internal auditing function. Contemporary Accounting Research 4 (2): 337 353. Mills, T. Y. 1996. The effect of cognitive style on external auditors' reliance decisions on internal audit functions. Behavioral Research in Accounting (Vol. 8): 49 73. Moeller, R. 2004. Managing internal auditing in a postSOA world. The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance 15 (4): 41 45. 50. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥٠ Nagy, L.. and Cenker, W. 2002. An assessment of the newly defined internal audit function, Managerial Auditing Journal. Bradford: Vol.17, Iss. 3; pg. 130, 8 pgs. O'Leary, C. and J. Stewart. 2007. Governance factors affecting internal auditors' ethical decisionmaking; An exploratory study. Managerial Auditing Journal . Bradford: Vol. 22, Iss. 8; pg. 787. Paape, L., Scheffe, J. and Snoep, P. 2003. The relationship between the internal audit function and corporate governance in the EU a survey. International Journal of Auditing , Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 247 62. Plumlee, R. D. 1985. The standard of objectivity for internal auditors: Memory and bias effects. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 683 699. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2004. Auditing Standard No. 2 (AS 2) An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Performed in Conjunction with An Audit of Financial Statements. http://www.pcaobus.org/documents/rules_of_the_board/S tandards%20-%20AS2.pdf. Quinn, Lawrence, “Risky Business”, The CPA Journal , June 2002, pp. 2 6, and Available from: Http//: www.aicpa.org/pubs/june2002. Raghunandan, K., William, J. R and Dasaratha, V. R. (2001), Audit committee composition, "gray directors," and interaction with internal auditing, Accounting Horizons. Sarasota: Vol.15, Iss. 2; pg. 105, 14 pgs. Ratcliffe, A. 2003. Communication and the audit committee. Accountancy Magazine. (July): 100. Sarens, G. and Ignace De Beelde. 2005. Internal auditors' perception about their role in risk management: A comparison between US and Belgian companies. Managerial 51. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥١ Auditing Journal. Bradford: Vol.21, Iss. 1/2; pg. 63, 18 pgs. Sawyer, L. 1973. The Practice of Modem Internal Auditing: Appraising Operations for Management. Altamonte Springs, FL: The Institute of Internal Auditors. Schneider, A. 1985a. Consensus among auditors in evaluating the internal audit function. Accounting and Business Research (Autumn): 297 301. Schneider, A. 1985b. The reliance of external auditors on the internal audit function. Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn): 911 919. Schneider, A. and Wilner, N. 1990. A test of audit deterrent to financial reporting irregularities using the randomized response technique. The Accounting Review 65(3): 668 681. SEC Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48745.2003 . (November 4). www.sec.gov. Staciokas, R and R. Rupsys . 2005. Internal Audit and its Role in Organizational Government. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=821989321 &sid=2&Fmt=4&clientId=35492&RQT=309&VName=PQD Stei n, M. T., D. A. Simunic, and T. B. O'Keefe. 1994. Industry differences in the production of audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Supplement): 128 142. Swanson, D. 2007. Setting longterm goals for internal audit. CMA Management. Hamilton: Jun/Jul .Vol. 81, Iss. 4; p. 19 (3 pages). Tapestry Networks. 2004. The internal auditor's perspective. Insights (July 6). The Institute of Internal Auditor. 2000. A New Breed of Malware, Available from: Http//:www.theiia.org/Itaudit/Index.cfm. 52. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥٢ Thurston, J. B. 1949. Basic Internal Auditing Principles and Techniques. Scranton, Pennsylvania: International Textbook Company. Tiessen, P. and R. H. Colson. 1990. External auditor reliance on internal audit. Internal Auditing (Winter): 10 22. Uecker. W. C., A. P. Brief, and W. R. Kinney, Jr. 1981. Perception of the internal and external auditor as a deterrent to corporate irregularities. Accounting Review (July): 465 478. Vallario, C. W. 2003. Internal audit: Active ingredient in reform mix. Financial Executive (June): 26. Wallace, W. 1984. A Time Series Analysis of the Effect of Internal Audit Activities on External Audit Fees. Altamonte Springs, FL: HA. Wallace, W. A., and R. W. Kreutzfeldt 1991. Distinctive characteristics of entities with an internal audit department and the association of the quality of such departments with errors. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 485 512. Ward, D. D. and J. C. Robertson. 1980. Reliance on internal auditors. Journal of Accountancy (October): 62 72. Whitley , J. 2005. Internal Auditing's Role in Corporate Governance, The Internal Auditor . Vol.62, Iss. 5; pg. 21, 2 pgs. Whittington, R. and L. Margheim 1993. The effects of risk, materiality, and assertion subjectivity on external auditors' reliance on internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Spring): 5064. 53. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥٣ ﺍﻟﺒﺤــــــﺚ ﻣﻼﺣـــﻖﺍﻟﺒﺤــــــﺚ ﻣﻼﺣـــﻖ ﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﻕ)١:(ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ،ﺍﻟﺒﺴـﻴﻁ ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ،ﺍﻟﺘﺩﺭﻴﺠﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻝ ﻭﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ"Kruskal –Wallis". ﺭﻗﻡ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﺤﻕ)٢:( ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﺼـــــــﺎﺀ ﻗﺎﺌﻤــــــﺔ. 54. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥٤ 55. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥٥ 56. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥٦ 57. ﻣﺠﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺎﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺒﺤﻮﺙ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ)۱ (ﺍﻟ ﻤﺠﻠﺪ ﺭﻗﻢ)٤٥ ( ﻳﻨﺎﻳﺮ۲۰۰۸ ٥٧
Comments
Copyright © 2025 UPDOCS Inc.