Civil Procedure AY 2014-15 Syllabus Avena

CIVIL PROCEDURE2nd Semester, AY 2014-2015 Prof. Victoria A. Avena Syllabus [Note: 1. The cases below are either bracketed or unbracketed. When a case is not bracketed, study the pertinent facts and consequent ruling/s. When a case is bracketed, note pertinent ruling/s. 2. References to statutes must be taken to refer to provisions relevant to the context.] Part I. Introductory concepts I.A. Remedial law, substantive law I.B. Judicial Power Nature, scope 1987 Constitution defined – Article VIII, sec's. 1, 5; judicial review re dec. relief – 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 63, sec. 1 (as am. by SC Resol. of 2-17-98) re presidential/vice-presidential elections – Art. VII.4 re martial law/suspension of writ of habeas corpus – Art.VII.18 statutory base of judicial review – Civil Code, Art. 7 judicial legislation – Civil Code, Art’s. 8 & 9 Constitutional protections re constitutional status – Art. VIII, sec. 2; Rule 56.3 re statutory increase of appellate jurisdiction – Art. VI.30 I.C. Adversarial system overview jurisdiction courts procedure parties pleadings litigation, mediation civil law vis-a-vis common law Part II. Jurisdiction II.A. “Prescribed” Jurisdiction – i.e., over subject matter, by law II.A1. General concepts Sindico v Diaz (G.R. No. 147444, October 1, 2004) kinds general/limited or special original/appellate exclusive/concurrent or confluent territorial definition/distinguished from exercise Tolentino v. Leviste (G.R. No. 156118, November 19, 2004) distinguished from venue – Manila Railroad v Atty.-General (20 Phil 523) general rule = jurisdiction cannot be waived; judgment without jurisdiction void Rule 9, sec. 1 Abbain v. Chua (22 SCRA 748) jurisdiction by estoppel = exception SEAFDEC v. NLRC (206 SCRA 283) Soliven v. Fastforms Phils. (G.R. No. 139031, October 18, 2004) cannot be the subject of compromise – Civil Code, Art. 2035 retroactivity – R.A. 7691, sec. 7 Siena Realty Corp. v. Gal-lang (G.R. No. 145169, May 13, 2004) adherence of jurisdiction - once attached, not ousted by subsequent statute unless so provided Southern Food v. Salas (206 SCRA 333) 2 7975 and R. Rule 43 -. as am. Rule 1. NLRC (G.A.2 P.. sec’s. Court of Appeals B. 21 -. 7902).D.R.2. No. By R. A. 129 (as am.special jurisdiction – sec.change of venue – People v. (G.A.in ordinary civil actions – sec. 1. Chavez (183 SCRA 347) Ortigas v. VIII. sec. 7 B. Zhandong Trading Corp.2.II. . No.A. Circular 09-94 (June 14.5. Sola (103 SCRA 393) P. R.P.M.2. By R. 129. Martin’s case) SC A.2.A.A. Rule 143 -. 19.A. 1994). Art. 1998) SC Resol. Supreme Court 1987 Constitution Art.b.SC Admin. R.A.in special civil actions and the special proceeding of habeas corpus – sec.exclusive appellate jurisdiction – sec. No. 4.c.P. 7691 3 . Martin Funeral Home v.question of law Urbano v. sec.1.M. 7691) -. December 8. 7-7-12 (December 4. 442. Regional Trial Courts B. CA (106 SCRA 121) Josefa v. 22 -. by R.A.P. 2007) II. 5 -.e Rule 43. 8249 II. 99-2-01 (dismissal for non-compliance w/ St. sec. Specific Jurisdiction of Courts II. 7902) [supra] 1987 Cons't. as am.R. A. 150903. 1606. sec.D. 9 (as amended by R. 130866.A. sec. 1. 2003) -. 2. VIII. 129. 9 (as amended by R. sec.a. 7691. Sept 16. 23. IX. 6715 St. 7.A.A. A. 5 (supra Part II) Art. as am. A. 129. July 29. Adviento (G.A. 28.R.A. 35 – summary procedure in special cases – B. 679-683] – Home Guaranty v. 1991) – Tagalog v. 192649. 30. No. No. Municipal. 673. 33 (3) as am.D.P. Sarmiento (109 Phil. 7691. Engr. 173351. No. July 9. 129. 33 (1).O.R. 3 – Lim Kieh Tong v. No. 3 & 5 – SC Admin. Circular 09-94 (June 4. 129. R. 2014) – in civil actions involving title to or possession of real property – B. 157802. 31. 2008) – exclusive original jurisdiction – in civil and estate settlement proceedings/over provisional remedies – B. Municipal Circuit Trial Courts Rule 5. 201286. 84330. CA (G. 7691. R.A.R. CA (208 SCRA 652) [read specially pp. 129. sec.R. SC Circular 38-97 – special jurisdiction – B. 129.R. 29. June 22.A. Tumpag (G. sec. sec’s. Castillo (G.A.R. Vda.P.SC Cir. Otake (G. 2010) – Indophil Textile v. 08-8-7-SC (October 1. 4. 129. R-II Builders (G. CA (G. sec’s.A. – 677. 129. after quote. 654-656.CB v. 2010) – Russel v. 537 A. Metropolitan. sec. sec. No. 2011) – Ascue v. 2014) -. last par. 148) – Matling Industrial v.R. par. 199133. 93451. No.P.d. sec. July 18. No. May 8. March 18. 7691. 1991) – Baito v. P. 196251.P. 661-665.P.-. October 13. 8369 (Family Courts Act of 1997) – Tumpag v. By R.R.M. 34.A. August 4. 171212. No. 2014)] Rule 47 II. sec. No.2. 33 (2). 3 – BF Citiland Corporation v. 33. 7691. sec. 36 4 . Coros (G. De Gonzales (G. sec. sec. No. 1994) – in forcible entry and unlawful detainer cases – B. R. 7691. 2014) [Olivarez Realty v. Vestil (304 SCRA 738) – delegated jurisdiction – B. No. 2 B. R. September 29.P. sec.R. 11-99 (transfer to RTC from MTC of cases w/in jurisdiction of family courts under R.P.. Scandia (24 SCRA 477) Good Development v. sec. 2009)] Commission on Higher Education [University of Sto. No.A.R. 627) Lapitan v. G.e.1. March 11.2) [STRADEC v. 180891. 7 service by publication – sec. Special Courts Sandiganbayan (Article XIII. 183035. 6657) [Land Bank v. Over the person – of the plaintiff – Manila Railroad v. 14 extra-territorial service – sec. 2010] Special Commercial Courts (R.R. 2010)] II.A. No.R. 231 SCRA 211] Family Courts (R. Special Rules Manufacturer’s Distributors v. November 17. No. sec’s. January 9. Shari'a Appellate Courts (R. 20 Optima Realty v.B.R. Atty. 182434. Villegas (G. 2010] National Commission on Indigenous People [City Government of Baguio City v. II.1) – of the defendant 1) by service of summons – Rule 14.5. 1083).A. Balindong. “Acquired” jurisdiction II.A. Asuncion. 165569. & 3 personal service – sec. Sanchez (G.A. 2010] [Republic v. G. Tomas v. 180206. P.D.R.II. 8369) Special Agrarian Courts (R.5.A. March 5. Tan (87 Phil.2. 1486) Shari'a District Courts (P. Yu Siu Liong (11 SCRA 680) Cruz v. 187872.D. 1994. 8799.R. 6734) [Tomawis v. Masweng (G. Hertz (G.R. No.B. 108208.-General (supra. 2013) 5 .f. 1.A. No. July 29. Tutaan (73 SCRA 189) II.2. 2. G. 6 substituted service – sec. No. March 26. February 4. No. 15 2) by voluntary appearance – Rule 14. SIDC. July 9. 15 Banco-Español-Filipino v.3) by voluntary submission Rodriguez v. 142037. Uniform procedure – Rule 5. 4.B. 7 Rule 10. sec. No. 176020.. 2008) Metropolitan Bank and Trust Co. 2003)] 6 . October 18. supra. 16514. Scope and Construction – Rule 1. sec’s.. v. 682-683] Philippine First Insurance Co. No.2.R. 5 Gonzaga v. 181842. Ferandos (64 SCRA 23.R. Actions Kinds – Rule 1. Lim (G.R. Ferandos (64 SCRA 23) II. No.B. Rural Bank of Lucena (81 SCRA 75) in personam/ in rem/ quasi in rem De Midgely v. No. Pyramid Logistics and Trucking Corporation (G. CA (supra. Inc. Alikpala (57 SCRA 455) II. February 5.R. 1 C.2) Rule 1. Part II. Over the issues Rule 18. 921) De Midgely v. 178911. CA (G. No. 2014) CB v. Jesus (G. Palanca (37 Phil. sec. Part V. Rule 14. et al. No. 3. 5 – commencement. 3 Nature real/personal/mixed Hernandez v. sec.3. September 17. C. sec. 2004) Part III. 1 Heirs of Julao v. sec. 2014) [Go v. sec. 2. 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure A. September 29. Perez (G. Sps.R. 2010) Monsanto v. Over the res – Rule 14. [emphasis on pp.B.R. 6 B. v. Tong (G. sec. November 27. 151942. No.R. 5 – joinder of causes of action Rule 3.R. April 13. 2005) Ma-ao Sugar Central v. Subic Bay (G. 3 – one suit for a single cause of action sec. Lopez (G. 2010) Oposa v. 9. 2014) Danfoss v. Romulo (G. 121165. 143788. Bautista ( 32 SCRA 188) Sagrada Orden de Precadores del Santisimo Rosario de Filipinas v. August 11. National Coconut Corporation (92 Phil. Factoran (224 SCRA 792) [Bayan Muna v. PCGG (225 SCRA 568) Miñoza v. Sep. Continental Cement (G.R.R. 482) Santiago v.Rule 2 – cause of action sec.R. No. sec. No. 6 Rule 3. 4 – effect of splitting Rule 16. Umale (G. 129. September 24. 159618. Dabon (G. No. 2 – definition Felipe v. GSIS (G. No. CA (G.P. 2 – parties in interest. September 10. February 1. 1 (e). Rule 3. sec. 2014)] [Ching v. 503) H. 26. Sep. 174353. No. Hollero Construction v. No. 172843. October 22.13 Rule 8. 158298. 666) sec. 2011) Ablaza v. 170914. Republic (G. Barrios (79 Phil.1 sec.R. Rule 16. 1 – basis sec. No.R. Parties – Rule 3 requisites sec. No.R. 187702/189014.15 Juasing Hardware v. September 24. 2006) Joya v.2 B.H. 152334. (f) sec.1. 2011)] [SEC v. 2014)] 7 .g Carillo v.33. 6 – misjoinder D. Mendoza (115 SCRA 783) sec. 1 – who may be parties.R. 2014)] [Villamor v. Leuterio (91 Phil. 6809 – sec. Oct. 5 – minor or incompetent R. No. No. March 3. 88-1-6460. 2008) sec. 12 – class suit Newsweek v.R. 155236.A. 1990) Orbeta v. March 23. 2004) Quiombing v. No. 2005) [Limos v.M. August 30. 13 – alternative defendants sec.O. 1997) Cerezo v.R. 7 – compulsory joinder of indispensable parties Wee v. et al.R.R. 2005) Re: Request of the Heirs of the Passengers of Doña Paz (A. 14 – unknown name or identity sec. 209. No. July 8. Regional Trial Court of Makati. August 20.kinds sec. 176405. 3 – representatives sec. No. August 30. 234 & 236). August 11. August 11. 30.O. 165744.R.R. August 16. art's. 2005) Chua v. see above) 8 . 209 (Family Code) – Art’s. L-8171. 21 – indigent party sec. 2.R. CA (G. IAC (142 SCRA 171) Manila Int’l.R. Odones (G. 15 – defendants w/o juridical personality sec. 151900. 2008)] sec. 5 sec. 1956)] sec. 10 – unwilling co-plaintiff sec. 209 – Art. CA (G. No. 1988) [Reyes v. 4 – spouses E. 145. 102900.'s 1 (re E. 186979. No. Robles Transportation Company (G. 141538. Rivera Village (G. No. 4 & 5 E. Sep. No. Airport Authority v. Tuazon (G.. 6 – permissive joinder Flores v. 143870. Mallare-Phillips (144 SCRA 377) sec.R. 111 sec. Beltran (supra. see above) Arcelona v. 8 – necessary party Wee v. Beltran (G.O. No. Sendiong (G. 11 – misjoinder and non-joinder Chua v.R. 2010)] [Manalo v. G. De Castro (G. 22 – when Solicitor General required to be party effects sec. 9 – non-joinder to be pleaded sec. De Castro (supra. 93010. 2 sec. No. 2010) sec.R. L-28256. v.R. 1 – pleadings defined sec.R. Tecson (G. 2011)] E. 2011)] F. 17 – death/ separation of public officer-party Gojo v. No. 19 – transfer of interest [Heirs of Medrano v. 3 – complaint sec. Inc. Intermediate Appellate Court (G. No. 190823. 2011)] [Navida et. 7 – actionable document Rule 8. al. Goyala (35 SCRA 557) sec. 154096. No. Dizon (G. September 1. et. 170463. No. 1991)] [Board of Trustees of GSIS v. 20 – re contractual money claim Del Castillo v. In general Rule 6 – kinds of pleadings sec. 16 – death Cruz v. August 22. 2 – where asserted Rule 8. 2004) Marcos-Araneta v. 173292. Spouses Dingco (G. Jaymalin (G.R.R. 1 – form in general sec. 6 – counterclaim 9 . Part II.R. Reyes (39 SCRA 303) Pilipino Telephone v. 2008) [Dacoycoy v. April 4. May 7. No.1 2.a) Time. 18 – incompetency/ incapacity sec.A.R. Cruz (G. De Vera (G. No. The claim Rule 6 sec. February 2. May 30. No. 156966. March 17. al. Velasco.R. 165770.2. (G. 74854. Pleadings 1. Sola (supra. 2010)] sec. Venue – Rule 4 People v.R. 2 – pleadings allowed Rule 8 – manner of making allegations in pleadings sec. CA (G. 1982) [Carabeo v. 125078. April 2. v. August 9.sec. No. September 26. Caballero (G. 2005) Pentacapital v. sec. Metropolitan Bank (G.R.R.2) GSIS v. 2010) Metrobank v. Absolute Management (G. 2010) Calo v. December 11. Mahinay (G.R. 2 – barred if not set up Chavez v. 2010) Compulsory counterclaim/ cross-claim Rule 6.R. No. 1994) 10 . sec. sec. Federacion (supra. 8 – existing compulsory counterclaim/ cross-claim Rule 9. 3 – dismissal of actions 3A Apparel v. No. 1992) Gojo v. Goyala (supra.sec. 2 – counterclaim where claim dismissed thru defendant's motion to dismiss Rule 17. 12 – bringing in new parties.R. 8 – cross-claim sec. No. May 17. 170498. 6. Villegas (G. 186175. sec. Federacion (49 SCRA 238) Rule 6.R.R. 9 – counterclaim/ cross-claim after answer Namarco v. 76838. par. etc. sec.R. 160242. 158090. Part III. April 17. 184 SCRA 374) Chan v. 2 – reply Rule 11 – when to file responsive pleadings sec. No. October 4. 7 – compulsory counterclaim Meliton v. August 25. Part III. Sandiganbayan (193 SCRA 282) Cojuangco v. 9 – counter-counterclaim and counter-cross-claim sec. sec. sec.F. 2006) Rule 6. sec. No. par. Court of Appeals (G.5 Rule 10. 1990. 171736. 101883. 2013) Rule 16. 157745. 109020) Mar. 11 – third-party complaint. 181482. 6 – amended and supplemental pleadings Young v Sy (G. No.D) Namarco v. January 9. Ajax (22 SCRA 996) Rule 11. Republic v. 2. Rule 1. No. July 5. No. 10. 3. CA (G.R. Central Surety (26 SCRA 741) Asian Construction v CA (G. No. Part III. etc. Jan 13. 11 – allegations deemed admitted Tec Bi v. Advertising v.R. Barrios (G. 2010)] 4. 10 – specific denial sec. The reply Rule 6 – sec’s. Sep. 133710.D) Rule 16.R. Ramas (G. 1946) 11 . December 15. 13 – answer to third-party complaint. 5 – defenses Gojo v. 596) Phil. CA (G. 151149.2(c) Baguioro v. 7 – based on document sec.R. Chartered Bank of India (41 Phil. 7. sec. sec. Banking Corp. Aug. 6 – grounds for dismissal as affirmative defenses Rule 8 sec. L-277. 2004) [Valientes v. No. 2 – pleadings allowed sec. 2004) sec. Common Provisions a) re parts of pleading – Rule 7 Rule 7. Olympic Sawmill (129 SCRA 439) CB Circular 905 sec. 8 – how to contest document Phil. No. 2 – alternative defenses. No. Palanca (G.13 Rule 9. 157852. 30. Revilla (52 SCRA 246) Liam Law v. The answer Rule 6 sec. Rule 3. 4 – answer sec. 1 – defense/ objection waived Katon v.3. Goyala (supra.R. sec. v. 2 and 10 5. 153696.R.R.D] [Mid-Pasig Land Development Corporation v. Jan 13. 11. v. Fajardo (223 SCRA 720) Wee v. 2010)] 7. 2014)] b) re manner of making allegations – Rule 8 except sec’s. de los Angeles (27 SCRA 1276) Phil. When to file responsive pleadings – Rule 11 12 . No. Hon.R. Pepanio (G. 2013)] [Hasegawa v. 8. Harris (69 Phil. 120384.D) Sps. Amended/ supplemental pleadings – Rule 10.9 Cerezo v. Beltran (supra.R. 48-2000 Cruz-Agana v. 12 6. No. Part III. No. SC Circular No. 2000) Bar Matter No. 2006) d) striking out pleadings – Rule 8. 11. 156599. No. 2004) Surigao Mining v. 10 and 11 Perpetual Savings v.R. 162924.5) c) re effect of failure to plead – Rule 9. November 23.4. No. 11.R. Kitamura (G. Part III.F. Tablante (G. 193897. 139018.R. Galvez (supra. July 26. 1132 Wee v. Rule 7.3 Bar Matter No. 2005) Wee v. 147394. 2010)] [University of the East v. 113) [Bormaheco v. Rule 30.5 Juasing Hardware v.R. 2007)] [Delfino. January 23. Mendoza (supra. Part III. Sep. Infrastructures (G.5. 2.D) Dauden-Hernaez v. No. 7. September 10. 2004) Rule 7. Galvez (supra. No. No. Sr. Anasao (G. RTC (G. Export v. 1922 Bar Matter No. Apr. Delos Santos v.Rule 7. February 4. Rule 1. 287 (September 26. Tuazon (supra. Galvez (G. Malayan (G.R. 149177. Santiago Lagman (G. sec. Part III. No. see above) [Chua v. 197486. Aug. Phil. 2005) GCP-Manny v.R. 173379. Inc. Sep. 00-2-14-SC Luz v.R. 5 . 24. National Amnesty Commission (G. No.R. 6 Prudential Bank v.R. 141484. Consulta (G. 148361. October 6.R. 3. Carlos (G. No. 2008) Camper Realty v. December 1.R.R.9 SC Resolution of February 17. 179543.8. Pajo-Reyes (G. 2005) Robinson v. March 10. Nov. 11. 2010)] 9. 15 Dial Corp.contents. December 12. No. 2005) Marinduque Mining and Industrial Corporation and Industrial Enterprises. 161219. substituted service – sec. 7 Gentle Supreme v. when issued. by whom issued – sec’s. 2. September 1.R. Maya-Maya (G. November 17. 2006) Palma v.M. 1. No. 180045. Principe (G.R.R. Galvez (G. VHF Phil. 2014) [Sps. 29. v. service in person – sec. Summons – Rule 14 . (G. 2004) 10. 165273. Sep. Miralles (G. 2010) Afdal v. 163584. October 15. No. Ong (G.R. Maximo (22 SCRA 1070) 13 . No. 1998 Bautista v. v. 2014)] 2. Soriano (161 SCRA 737) Montalban v. Magdamit (G. 205249. 2010) [GSIS v. 2010) 3. 138500. 16.3 icow Rule 51.R. No. 2010) Andy Quelnan v. 159708. Nov. No. Filing/Service of Pleadings. 183182. Judgments and Other Papers – Rule 13 Rule 13. extra-territorial service – sec. November 12.modes of service 1. Benedict v. Computation of Time – Rule 22 A. Bill of Particulars – Rule 12 G. No.R. No. No. No. Court of Appeals (G. 183795. October 6. NLRC (G. 16 - mode of service upon certain defendants 1. 11 Paluwagan ng Bayan v. 10. No. 20. 1079 4. 11-3-6-SC (New Rule on Service of Summons on Foreign Private Juridical Entity) Facilities Management v. upon others – sec’s. Licaros (G. Quilala. Galvez (supra.a Tung Ho v. Part III.return/proof of service – sec’s. 9.G. 78328. 15. 2008) Cathay Metal v.1) -. 168723 July 9. Reinato G. by publication – sec’s. CA (168 SCRA 354) – leave of court – sec. Ferandos (supra) Sahagun v.D. Maximo (supra. 2014) 2.A. SC A. No.De Midgley v. 172204. King (172 SCRA 62) Dole Philippines. (G.3) Palma v. 4883. Alikpala (supra. 12. upon defendant whose identity/ whereabouts unknown – sec. 12. Laguna West (G. 2003) R.2) 4. 17 5.M. sec. 16 Montalban v. 19 14 . Part VI. upon resident temporarily abroad – sec.R. De la Osa (89 SCRA 131) 3.B. upon foreign private juridical entity – sec. 150656.R.R. Rule 16. 13 – voluntary appearance – sec. CA (G. April 7. 14 Baltazar v. upon domestic private juridical entity – sec. vs. G. Ting Guan (G. P. 1991) Romualdez-Licaros v. 8. 4. Part II. 14. July 2. No. 18. No.1. Inc. June 3. No. Hon. April 29.R. 182153. 2014) – voluntary submission – Rodriguez v.R. No. 2. Javier (G. Part III. v. sec.R. 68 R16.R.R. Aligaen (76 SCRA 178) Villarino v.R. 161135. 2009) Santiago v. 198680) Heirs of Licaros v. Dabon (supra. CA (G. 2011) [Bacelonia v. B.R. No.1 Philville v. Sandiganbayan (G. August 14. Sep 30. December 11.R. 153721. 8. No. No. Oct. June 5. No. 181132. September 15. 2005) Arcelona v. sec. 1 Rule 6.R. 142131.R. No.4 Rule 9. Donato (G. 180595. No. No.141528. 168973. 18. Surecomp Software (G.R.P. 173463. Sandiganbayan (G.R. 2004) Regala v. 2005) Lee Bun Ting v.A. 2005) Heirs of Ypon v. Part III. Motion to Dismiss under Rule 16 U. No. Sy (G. Sep.R. 20. Rustia (G. 154554.R.S. 2003)] [Philippine National Railways v. 157438. sec. No. 2. Part II. 13. 2007) Global Business v. NLRC (supra. 2010) Maramag v.R. Dakila Trading Corporation (G.R.47 Section 133. 26.R. October 13.147738.D) Del Rosario v. De Los Santos (61 SCRA 146) Goodyear v. No.105938. Avila (G. Court of Appeals (G. Nov. March 5. 2006)] I. 2005) Balo v. Apr. 143440. Sep. No. 129704. No. sec. No. Dec. February 11. 31. 2010) 15 . 1996) Swagman Hotel v. Oct. Motions in general – Rule 15 City of Dumaguete v.H. No. Maramag (G. CA (supra. August 24.R. 2006) Malion v.1) Rule 2. 2006) Perkin Elmer Singapore Pte Ltd. 172242. 5 Rule 39. No. 2002) Carillo v.R. v Ruiz (136 SCRA 487) SEAFDEC v. Ricaforte (G. 9.131191. Alcantara (G. 5 (b) Rule 7. Philippine Ports Authority (G. Lee (G. CA (G.D) Lacap v. Goyala (supra. 2009) M.R. Rule 18. No. 178830.R. No. 194638. August 16. September 18. CA (G. Goodland Company. et al. No. No. No. No. 2010)] [Suplico v. v. December 8. No.5 Sps. CA (G.R. 131471. 2004) Paredes v. Lim (G. sec. No.R. Dismissal under Rule 17 [Majestic Finance v. 2003)] [Sea-Land Service. 2007)] [Panganiban v. 203834. Cheng. Alabang Hills Village Association (G. 2003)] [Lourdes Suites v. 2.R. 2. 2006) 16 . Motion to Dismiss under Rule 7. 126212. No.R. Sandiganbayan (G. et. No. Part III. 154338.R. 2014)] [Ching v. G. 2003) [Asia United Bank. Mendoza (G. 2014) Garcia v.R.3 Gojo v. 200191. No. DPWH (G. Santos (G. 175507 (October 8. No. October 5.R. 190231.164375. Pre-trial – Rule 18 SC A. June 2. Villegas (G. 153571. October 22. 204729. No.R. No. 2014)] L. 170599. October 12. January 30. 193108. Judgment on the Pleadings – Rule 34. Part III. 187456.R. Mar. Neda (G. (G. 197442. June 18. 168313. 2010)] [BPI v.R. September 22. March 31.R.M. August 20.R. 2000)] [Wee v. Inc. 2014)] [Mendoza v. Pacific Plans (G. CA (G. Verano (G. 2014)] [Parañaque Kings v. (G. No. July 14 2008)] [Universal Robina Corporation v. Lim v.R.R.D)] [Public Hearing Committee of the Laguna Lake Development Authority. No. No.R. Rule 9. 2013) Fernandez v. 2010)] [Victorio-Aquino v. 166393. October 6. v.D) Reillo v. June 22. January 22. Sandiganbayan (G.R. v. 120135. CA (G. 192615. 2014)] [Bank of America v. Pilipinas (G. No.R. San Jose (G. De Castro (supra. No.R.R. July 9. 2005) Benguet v. 2014)] [Disini v. No. Inc.[Alabang Development Corporation v. August 6. SM Prime Holdings. Binarao (G. July 5. No. Mangudadatu (G. No. 165835.R. 03-1-09-SC Jonathan Landoil Int’l. Court of Appeals (G. Inc. December 10. 2014)] J.R. 2010)] K. 175730. v.155010. July 2. al. Rule 30. 2014)] [Absolute Management v. Oct 18. 2014)] c. First Metro (G. November 29. 1998) 17 .R.R. July 23. No. 145276. March 22. 2014)] N. Magno Construction (G. Rule 22 Uy v. January 29. (G. Sep.3 Holiday Inn v. No. RTC (G. Mangadadatu (supra. September 22. No. sec. 2006) Espinoza v. 2010) b. sec. 2006) [R22. 3 (f) d. No. calendar of cases – Rule 20 b. Rule 67. 2004) 3. subpoena – Rule 21. Trial proper – Rule 30 OCA Cir. 196219.R.R. 175380. 2014)] 2.9 Angara v.156822. October 17. Sandiganbayan (186 SCRA 447) [Pulgar v. 1-89 Rule 30. CA (G. Alvendia (G.R.R. modes of discovery AM No.R. consolidated/separate – Rule 31 Sps. No. No. 39-98 SC Cir. 2008)] [Noynay v. Tabino (G. 110495. sec. July 30. 190277. intervention – Rule 19. Tecson (G. Corp. October 8.M) 2) interrogatories to parties – Rule 25 PBP v. United Overseas Bank (G. 176706. Incidents/processes a. September 10. 8 [Tabino v. 27. No. 157583. Yu v. 5. Course of Trial 1. No.R. PART III.R. No. trial by commissioners – Rule 32.1] e. 2005) [Ramos v. Rule 11. No. No. Fedman Dev’t. 204160. 03-1-09-SC (July 13.R. 2004) 1) deposition pending action – Rule 23 Jonathan Landoil v.138701-02. Rule 71.167245. Cityhomes Builder (G. Metropolitan Bank (G.Agulto v. No. Kinds of trial a.R. 159357.R. 2005) i) archival SC Adm.refusal to comply with modes of discovery – Rule 29 f) summary judgment – Rule 35 Allied Agri-Business Development Company v. No. Civil Code Lee Bun Ting v. above) Republic v. Chan (G. Effect of Judgment Rule 39. No. Judgments. July 15. 2004) Macias v. July 1. May 16. CA (193 SCRA 732) Oropeza v. 2037. 129788. Cir. 2003) Grand Farms v. Macias (G. CA (193 SCRA 748) Bitanga v. Part III. 118438. Rule 36.R.G.R. No.3) admission by adverse party – Rule 26 Allied Agri-Business v. No. Pyramid Construction Engineering Corporation (G. January 20. 2003) PNB v.P. Allied Bank (G. sec’s.R. 173526. 2008) g) demurrer to evidence – Rule 33 Northwest Airlines – G.5) 1. No. sec’s. November 26. Sandiganbayan (G. I) Nabus v. No. 154115.R. 152154.R. VIII. 189316. 142406.R. CA (G. CA (G. CA (supra. B.38 Velarde v. Aligaen (supra. September 3. Choa (G. No. No.R. CA (G. December 4.R. April 28. 2002) h) lis pendens – Rule 13.4 Romero v. August 28. 179786. July 24. Part III.R. 47 and 48 Art. No.1. December 3. Art. Final Orders and Entry thereof – Rule 36 1987 Constitution. 1998) 4) production/inspection of documents/things – Rule 27 Yu v. 1998) Choa v. No. 2013) -. 149617.R. 2013) Tung Ho v. 120334. 13 and 14. 1993) O. No. No.R. No. 143376. 129. 2006) 5) physical/mental examination of persons – Rule 29 Chan v. SJS (G. 2002) 18 . Marañon (G. Ting Gian (supra. June 28. 7-A-92 (June 21. R. No. 2008) Tumbokon v. January 28. 196049. No. L30098. March 24. sec’s. Jollibee (G. Heirs of Dino (G. 2014) Chinabank v. No. 170406. 191101. Heirs of Dionisio (G. 157833. 2010) Okabe v. 2014) Buan v. August 25. June 16. November 13. CA (G. No. December 10. 208462. 2010 Bausa v. July 9. Marinay (G.R. 2010)] [Chavez v.R.Sps. 2008) Republic v. Ruiz (G. Daisy Yahon (G. 2014) Villeza v. June 26.R. 2010) Clidoro v. August 26. July 9. No. Lopez (145 SCRA 34) Buazon v. 182937. 2010) Fujiki v. No. No.R. August 25. No. G. August 4. 2014)] [Commissioner of Public Highways v. Ocampo v. 121943. 159411. Jalmanzar (G. L-60887. 6-93 (February 9. 2000)] [BPI v.R.R.R. 196040. 2014)] 2. No. October 1. 186192. 2010) Heirs of Divinagracia v. 136805. 2003) Perla Compania v. 1970)] 19 . Tarcelo (G.R.R. August 11. 159230. San Diego v.20] SC Cir. No.R. 2014) [Diesel Construction v. 1991) Heirs of Pidacan v. No. 190818. August 8. No. 2014) La Campana Development v. 176598. 198139. 2007)] [Suntay v.E. CA (G. CA (220 SCRA 182) Ali-Bondagjy v. 153736. No. Legaspi (G. Execution. 165582. Ledesma (G. No. 1 to 46 [NOTE R39. Keyser (G. 2005)] [Metro Manila Shopping v. No.R. German Management (G. Roxas (G.R. 154152. August 28.R.R. November 10. Civil Code Rule 39. 10-25-2000 National Power v. No. September 8. February 18. October 18. 1993) SC Cir. 1998) SC Cir. Satisfaction of Judgments Article 1491. 167281. October 15.R. 201043. Ordinario (G. 2013) [B. 5-98 (January 12.R.R. Saturnino (G. No.R. No.R.R. No. Artadi (G. No. No. San Diego (G.7 icow R3.R. March 18. No. Toledo. Air Transportation Office (G. Ramolete (G. 155018. Jr. Del Mundo (G.M. 1996) Cuenca v. 109870. De Ocampo (G.R.R. Sanritsu (G. Salamanca (G.R.R. 125799. January 9. 2007) City of Dagupan v. People (G. G. 2014)] 4. Malayan (G. 1995) Q. September 20. December 17. December 11. 1997) Fukuzumi v.R.P. April 7. 57058. 2004) Palma v. 2003) PAL v. June 11. Relief from Judgments. CA 195 SCRA 418. Rule 41. 174411. People (G.2) Calderon v.R. March 15. 2014)] [Magsino v. L-48656. Village Hotel (G. 1987) Helmuth.R. No. No.R. No. No. September 21.D) Agan v.R. 150922. Nos. No. No. Phil. Rule 40.R. Orders or Other Proceedings – Rule 38 Cerezo v. 48-2000 Heirs of Poe v. No. 146611. 185595. 2013) Diesel v.R.R.R. No. No.R. Tuazon (supra. From MTC to RTC to CA – Rule 42 3. 172776. August 21. Roxas (G. February 6. No. No. August 12. Appeal 1. 156302. From MTC to RTC – Rule 40 2. October 16. 140630. 2004) Redeña v. CA (G.R. 1967) People v. From RTC to CA – Rule 41 SC A. Galvez (supra. 2007) SC Cir. No. 2003) Legarda v. 2014) R. Amparado (G.3 Cansino v. 2008) 20 . Porter (G. Nueva (G. G. Maramba (G. From QJA to CA – Rule 43 CHED v. Part III. 2009) GSIS v. January 28. 203288. September 29. 2000) [Gadrinab v. No.R. Salcedo (G.R. Jolibee (G. No. 166944. v. 194560. CA (G. New Trial or Reconsideration – Rule 37. 94457. December 1. 136805. 119964-69. July 2.R. 1982) People v.2. 7-7-12 (December 4. No. No. L-22119. No. August 18. July 18. 2014)] [Mauleon v.R. December 21. Dasig (G. Part III. October 15.R. Procedure in CA – Rule 44 and Rules 48 to 54 SC Resolution of February 17. 2004) W. 2012) U. 206234. No.I) [Mangaser v. Gallemore (G. Leviste (supra. August 24.R. 2014) [Banco de Oro v. Gabor (G. III.R.M. No.R. CA (G. August 26. 1948.M. No.M. Cir. July 23. 04-7-03-SC (July 13. CA (G.F.R. 99-2-01-SC A. 7-7-12 (December 4. Preliminary Attachment – Rule 57 Mabanag v.R. 1998 (supra. 190445. Nos. No. Part III. Sps. No.5) Maramag v. supra. No. 2014)] Bote v. 2008) Paulino v. Provisional Remedies A. To SC – Rule 45. RTC Las Pinas (G. August 5. December 3. 185734.R. Part II.F. 04-10-11-SC (November 15. 177425. Rule 64 SC A. No. Galvez (supra. Original Actions in CA – Rules 46 and 47 Almelor v. 2014) Tolentino v. No. 48.M. No. Ugay.R.5-11 and 52 [Heirs of Sobremonte v. Veloso (G. Sps.1.M. 194270.A. Lazaro. June 4. 2004) SC A. No.R. Maramag (supa. 1993) Wee v. 205065 & 207533. 170674. G. 02-11-12-SC (March 15.10) Samson v. 2014)] [Gipa v. 179620.2. 51. 254) Cuartero v. 2014)] V. 182970.2014) T. Procedure in SC – Rule 56 icow Rules 45. L-825.1) Castro v.R. June 18. July 3. No.R. 1992) Foundation Specialists v. No. Part VI. 51. 188801. July 23. 81 Phil. 51. Sps. 102448.5.5] S. Southern Luzon (G. Part III. 2007) SC Admin. No. Gregorio (G. July 20. 3-96 (February 9. 2003) A. CA (G. No. Locsin (G.R. No. October 22. 2009) [Lim v.R. Betonval Ready Concrete (G. 2013)] 21 . 38-2002 (August 28. October 31.R. July 5.X. No. BPI Agricultural Development Bank (G.M. 29-2002 (July 1.R. No. 99-2-04-SC A. No. 174569. June 25. 2014)] Y. 110086.Rule 62 B. SJS (supra. 126911. Preliminary Injunction – Rule 58 SC A.R. 1998 Velarde v.R.A. 2010) 22 . No. 2002) Benguet v. Receivership – Rule 59 Talag v. July 19. No. Part III. CA (supra. CA (G. 1999) [BPI v. 2002) SC Admin. CA (G. 179230.R. 2003) Ferrer v. Cir. April 30. No. CA (G.M. IAC (G. 20-95 (February 12 . No. Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies – Rule 63 SC Resolution of February 17. 7-7-12 (December 4. 174129.J) Dungog v. 139767. 68-94 (November 3.N) PDIC v. 10) SC Cir. September 17.R. 11-2000 R. Roco (G. 13-93 P. March 21. Part III. Cir. 2008) Lim v. Part VI. 1984) China Banking Corporation v. Co (G. No. 86792.R.R. 2003) Traders Royal Bank v. No. 1818 (1989) SC Admin. Replevin – Rule 60 Sapugay v. 2007) SC Admin. 1990) AA. CA (G. No. 66321.R. August 5.1995) SC Admin. No. Special Civil Actions SC A. 1994) SC Resolution of February 17. F. Judge Hontanosas (G. March 9. 8975 SC Cir. Cir. 157163. Cir. CA (189 SCRA 801) A.D. No. Support Pendente Lite – Rule 61 IV. 1998 (supra. Interpleader -. 2010) Paramount Insurance v. 1992) Municipality of Makati v. No. Mandamus – Rule 65 PALEA v. see Rule 45) SC Resolution of February 9. 2008) Eng v. CA (G. 47518. No. No. No. 159275.R.R.R. August 13. June 11. 2014)] [City of Davao v. January 22. August 7. 2014)] E. 1990) Vital-Gozon v. 14638. Certiorari – 1987 Constitution. Mathay (185 SCRA 124) Dungog v.R.R. Art. Inc. Part II. June 18. 1. 7-7-12 (December 4.W) Badua v. No. 2013) Tesorero v.R. December 18. No. 171947-48. July 9.R.R. Executive Secretary (G. January 15. No. No. No. CA (G. 200538. Cordillera Bodong (G. 2014)] [Ad Hoc Fact-Finding v.R.R. Ocampo (G.1) National Artist v. No. Part III. 2006) F. October 1. Dayrit (G.M. 2014) Aquino v. April 15. 190253. 122156. No. September 29. Uniwide Sales (G. 1982) United Housing v. Concerned Residents of Manila Bay (G. Nos. No. CA (G.R. 2009 [Republic v. 211356. February 14. 163999. CA (supra.5)] [Republic v. 166501. No. 1997) Francisco v. 2007) SC Admin.R. 3-96 (supra. G. et al. Fernando (G. July 16. 129846. November 16. 1990. January 18. Galvez (supra. 1990) Systems Plus v.R. 2014) Calagui v. No. 2000)] [Trajano v. 89898-99.R.A.R. PAL (G. 31396. No. 2003) MMDA v.R. No. No. 135703. CA (G. CA (G. January 30. sec. 189028. 1998 D. Cir. 186 SCRA 564) Siena Realty Corp.F. v. No. July 14. Gal-lang (supra. RTC (G. Rule 65 SC A.R. 173861. April 8. 101428. 1999 re A. No. 2008)] [Wee v. v.R.R. No. August 25. GSIS (G. Royal Savings and Loan Association (G. 2010)] [PLDT v. 92649. 99-2-01-SC Candelaria v. Desierto (G. 1991) [Tible & Tible Company. Prohibition – Rule 65 Manila Prince Hotel v. Mun. Part III. No. 76422. VIII. August 5. Sandiganbayan.R.R. 176831. 155806. Lee (G. Rule 64 SC Resolution of February 17. No.C. 2010) 23 . No. February 3. of Malay (G.M. Local Government (G. Zabala (G. No. Sps.R. Lee (supra. (G. 2003) Villondo v. 197329.A.R. 2014) [ATO v. 146815. No. Anacay (G. Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage – Rule 68 Rosales v. 146886. Silverio. 181218. Part III. Gabor (supra. January 28. September 30. 2014) Laurora v.R. CA (G. 173520. G. Masili (G. March 30. Sr. Sterling (G. 2014) J. No. No. 2014)] 24 . Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer – Rule 70 Zacarias v. Bgy. 2010)] H. 106804. No. Quo Warranto – Rule 66 Moro v. Alfonso (G.5) Lacap v. Aquino (G.R. No. No.R. October 22. 2011) [Villanueva v. No. No. 180764. No. No. 8974 NAPOCOR v. September 8. 2012) Mangaser v.R. Expropriation – Rule 67 R. Del Castillo (G. 169568.R. 2013)] [Republic v. July 18.R.T) K.R. 2003) NPC v. Quijano (G. April 30. 202354. 186589. 176625. January 19. Samar (G. Listana (G. 2010)] [Napocor v. September 24. Contempt – Rule 71 Igot v. 2004) [Jakihaca v. Meralco Land Bank v. Ligon (G. Rosqueta (G. August 5.R.R. August 12.R. No. August 12. Tecson.G. Jr. January 30. 152611. No.R. 173616. 2014) [Silverio.R. 1990) [Lim v. September 15.R. 173606. 2004) Bardillon v. v. No. December 3.R. No. 2013)] [Secretary v. No. 2003) Angeles v. No. February 25. CA (G. Tantuico (188 SCRA 300) [Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority v. Lozada (G. Yapcinco (G. No. No.R. 184980. July 1. 2014)] L. 183589. Part III. 154391-92. June 25.R. No.R. June 25. 2014)] I. CA (G. 2003) Robles v.I) Macasaet v. April 9. 2013] [National Power Corporation v. Partition – Rule 69 Samson v. 179334.R. Macasaet (G. No. 178733. Ugay (supra. 137792.R. January 12. Gutierrez (193 SCRA 1) Ansaldo v. Heirs of Bautista (G. 83982.R. III. No. August 6. No. Theresa's (G. September 16. 02-1-06-SC SC Circular 2-89 A. Hon.Select Procedural Laws R. 182484.160032. G. No.M.R. of National Defense v. No. No. 83982. September 29. 2014)] [NOTE: Under the Constitution – Select Procedural Rules for the enforcement and protection of constitutional rights A. St. 2008 (Rule on Small Claims Cases) [Lourdes Suites v.R.R. 2003) A.M.R. February 18. G. No. 1990] [Mauleon v. No.M.M. June 17. 206510. 17. 2010) So v.R. Manalo (G. 2007) (Rule on the Writ of Amparo) Sec. No. No. 190473. 157830. 2008) Rubrico v. 02-11-11-SC (March 15. 399-422 (Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law) R.R. 9285 [Berba v. No. October 7.R.R. No. 202666. Pablo (G. 204729. sec’s. 2014)] A. 180906.M. Jr. October 19. (G.. Macapagal-Arroyo (G. 09-6-8-SC (Rules of Procedure for Environmental Cases) Most Rev. 183871. 190108. Binarao (G. 04-9-07-SC A. 11.R. 2008) Tapuz v. 203288. January 12. 08-8-7-SC. July 18. 01-2-04 A. Judge del Rosario (G. 2014)] 25 . No. October 1.A.M. 2005)] Select Procedural Rules 1991 Revised Rule on Summary Procedure [Jakihaca v. Pascual (G. Porter (G. 2005)] [Pascual v.R. No. Nov. No. 02-11-10-SC (March 15. No. 07-9-12-SC 25 (September 25. Aquino (G. 7160.R.M. Tacla. No. Arigo v. Swift. No. 2003) SC Adm.M. No. 2010) A. 08-1-16-SC (Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data) Vivares v.R. No. Memo.A. Nov. 2014) A. No.